Oregon passes 114 , New gun law

[ghosthunter]

https://ballotpedia.org/Oregon_Measure_114,_Changes_to_Firearm_Ownership_and_Purchase_Requirements_Initiative_(2022)

[Lucky1]

Unconstitutional to be sure. It’s what the left does. They make your freedoms expensive.

[pianoman9701]

I wonder how long before the courts strike this down. It puts an undue burden on citizens to exercise their rights and doesn't provide funding to LE to perform the class necessary to obtain a permit. The sheriff's association is also questioning the constitutionality of this initiative.

[Bob33]

They out-Washingtoned Washington.

[kramman]

Democrats are monkey see monkey does. So watch for initiative just like this coming to a state near you.... Wa.

[RB]

How are they legally getting so many items on an initiative? I thought when an initiative was voted on it was for one item? So showing your photo ID, every state already requires this, and more background checks, everyone already does this as well, will help right? I would say unbelievable, but anymore that is not the case. 

[highside74]

The sheriff's are already saying they won't follow the new 114 laws.

[rtspring]

I live here!!! This won’t become law…. Bet on it

[timberfaller]

Wa is a blue state, see: Penns, Ore, Kommiefornia, Mich and Minn and NY this last election!!

The Marxist have spoken!!

IF you voted for any D this last week, YOU are part of the problem, not the solution!

Never seen such stupidity in all my 67 years!! 

[jackelope]

Is this the same thing as a pistol permit in a state like NY? 

There, you can’t own a handgun without a permit and it’s been that way since I was a kid.

[Bob33]

The phrase "shall not be infringed" seems clear to me.

[Cougartail]

I live here!!! This won’t become law…. Bet on it

I'm pretty sure you are right. It's lowlife commies sticking a stick in our eyes.

Until penalties are assessed to these clowns for knowingly trying to curb our constitional rights they will continue this childish game.

[ghosthunter]

What am I missing? Looks like it has been voted and passed.

A SCOTUS ruling would be years away.

[Cougartail]

What am I missing? Looks like it has been voted and passed.

A SCOTUS ruling would be years away.

Any Federal Judge can issue an injunction against it.

[HntnFsh]

I live here!!! This won’t become law…. Bet on it

I wish you were right. But unfortunately I think you will be wrong in the long run.