collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: We are pursuing a lawsuit against the Governor  (Read 54373 times)

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25060
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: We are pursuing a lawsuit against the Governor
« Reply #255 on: October 01, 2023, 10:14:24 PM »
Ruth Musgrave
Senior Policy Advisor, Natural Resources
360-522-6031
ruth.musgrave@gov.wa.gov

Let’s make sure we leave it at that. We don’t allow sharing of personal information, regardless of who it is. This info is fine as it’s her state employee info.

Yep, public information.

And she was a Bord member of Defeners of Wildlife
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Online Jake Dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 3884
  • Location: Des Moines
Re: We are pursuing a lawsuit against the Governor
« Reply #256 on: October 02, 2023, 02:09:32 AM »
JT Austin was the Natural Resources advisor for Inslee before Musgrave. JT was responsible for most of these clowns and illegal appointment's and made a hasty disappearance. JT was likely the party to which a bunch of the illegal appointment's could be point at.

What makes the appointments “illegal”?  :dunno:

Well the fact that the governor didn't follow RCW 77.04.040 which stated sportsmen groups need to be consulted, Balance between the stakeholders is necessary...

Now apparently this appointed judge thinks that this RCW can be ignored because  The govenor has wide latitude in selection of appointments. Ironically I dont think the names of the commissioners that were selected were ever on a public list that sportsmen could have vetted... I wonder if that could have been one of the pieces of evidence for the case.. Or perhaps they were scared of discovery that would revel the daming communications between the Govenor, JT Austin, and Anti hunting groups.

I can only assume that you havent ready anything that WWC or others have posted on this issue, or the court filings because its all in those documents even if you disagree... But a trail wont take place so the point is moot.
It’s almost like you don’t remember discussing this when the lawsuit was proposed.
Environmentalist Fundamentalist

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yukon wolf by NWBREW
[Today at 08:56:14 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by mikey549
[Today at 08:43:48 PM]


Daughters doubled up before 8am by Widgeondeke
[Today at 08:37:02 PM]


SPIKE??? by carpsniperg2
[Today at 08:08:17 PM]


As He Lay by NWBREW
[Today at 08:06:28 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by tgomez
[Today at 07:45:44 PM]


49 DN Moose Success by Caseknife
[Today at 05:54:46 PM]


2025 sheds….let's see em by PastorJoel
[Today at 05:20:00 PM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 04:03:17 PM]


Elk Outfitter in Elbe, WA by Jellymon
[Today at 03:54:21 PM]


Talking About Barely Legal by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 03:05:57 PM]


Duck Boat Blind by gallion_t
[Today at 02:59:14 PM]


2025 opener by metlhead
[Today at 02:56:05 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 01:59:09 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by goosehunter12
[Today at 12:55:31 PM]


Displaced Hunting Camps? by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 10:49:57 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 08:43:13 AM]


climbing stick users by MeepDog
[Today at 08:11:01 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal