collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: We are pursuing a lawsuit against the Governor  (Read 57479 times)

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25045
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: We are pursuing a lawsuit against the Governor
« Reply #255 on: October 01, 2023, 10:14:24 PM »
Ruth Musgrave
Senior Policy Advisor, Natural Resources
360-522-6031
ruth.musgrave@gov.wa.gov

Let’s make sure we leave it at that. We don’t allow sharing of personal information, regardless of who it is. This info is fine as it’s her state employee info.

Yep, public information.

And she was a Bord member of Defeners of Wildlife
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Jake Dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 3959
  • Location: Des Moines
Re: We are pursuing a lawsuit against the Governor
« Reply #256 on: October 02, 2023, 02:09:32 AM »
JT Austin was the Natural Resources advisor for Inslee before Musgrave. JT was responsible for most of these clowns and illegal appointment's and made a hasty disappearance. JT was likely the party to which a bunch of the illegal appointment's could be point at.

What makes the appointments “illegal”?  :dunno:

Well the fact that the governor didn't follow RCW 77.04.040 which stated sportsmen groups need to be consulted, Balance between the stakeholders is necessary...

Now apparently this appointed judge thinks that this RCW can be ignored because  The govenor has wide latitude in selection of appointments. Ironically I dont think the names of the commissioners that were selected were ever on a public list that sportsmen could have vetted... I wonder if that could have been one of the pieces of evidence for the case.. Or perhaps they were scared of discovery that would revel the daming communications between the Govenor, JT Austin, and Anti hunting groups.

I can only assume that you havent ready anything that WWC or others have posted on this issue, or the court filings because its all in those documents even if you disagree... But a trail wont take place so the point is moot.
It’s almost like you don’t remember discussing this when the lawsuit was proposed.
Environmentalist Fundamentalist

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Oregon antelope by Bob33
[Today at 10:22:56 AM]


turkey hunting question series - question 2 by birddogdad
[Today at 10:05:31 AM]


turkey hunting question series - question 3 by brokentrail
[Today at 10:03:41 AM]


when should i give up on a turkey and move on? by birddogdad
[Today at 10:02:25 AM]


blacktail deer bait by 270Flat
[Today at 10:00:19 AM]


Some nice animals from last season by TeacherMan
[Today at 09:00:49 AM]


CRSSE license by LayMdown
[Today at 08:30:51 AM]


North Idaho Houndsmen Association Banquet by Machias
[Today at 08:11:25 AM]


First time coyote hunting by birdshooter1189
[Today at 06:47:57 AM]


Birds are gobbling hard now! by bearpaw
[Today at 06:16:17 AM]


Looking for help with Cummins 6CTA (8.3 liter medium duty diesel) by Skillet
[Yesterday at 11:05:51 PM]


Anyone tried the .338 ARC by FlyFish360
[Yesterday at 08:45:04 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:17:46 PM]


Wyoming 2026, who's in? by HoytHunter24
[Yesterday at 04:04:10 PM]


Vet's day finale by metlhead
[Yesterday at 03:09:37 PM]


R.I.P. ~ Gary York by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 10:58:04 AM]


Winchester SX3 problem by Emptyhanded
[Yesterday at 07:53:55 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal