collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands  (Read 3262 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« on: January 26, 2023, 10:59:39 PM »
Senate Bill 5314 would require users of e-bikes on state lands to have an "e-bike pass" for their e-bike. The pass would be $5. Failing to purchase the pass would result in a $99 fine which would be reduced to $59 if the violator purchases the pass within 15 days of being cited. Funds from pass sales and fines would return to WDFW, DNR, and State Parks for maintaining trails open to e-bike use.

The bill is sponsored by Senators J. Wilson (R), Cleveland (D), Nobles (D), and Randall (D)

https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2023-24/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Bills/5314.pdf?q=20230126225130

Offline Henrydog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 1115
  • Location: Eastern Washington
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, RMEF, Phesants Forever
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2023, 05:07:42 AM »
Thanks for posting, I am not shooting the messenger.   I don't own any type of bike, this has no effect on me, but enough is enough.  Public land is owned by the public.  I guess that is only the case at Camp Hope.

Remember when the Discovery Pass was a one year stop gap.

 Where is all the dope tax money?

This State views taxes like a hungry fat kid at the Golden Corral.

Offline JakeLand

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4575
  • Location: Wet side
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2023, 05:49:16 AM »
Complete crap , next will be Tesla charge stations at trailheads

Offline Mulie87

  • Trade Count: (+20)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 923
  • Location: Puyallup
  • Groups: NRA USPSA
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2023, 06:44:13 AM »
It’s all a out the Benjamin's. 💵

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2023, 06:46:48 AM »
Wow. There really is no end to the money grubbing from Olympia

Offline CSherwood

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2018
  • Posts: 24
  • Location: Renton, Wa
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2023, 07:10:55 AM »
Wow!

I own an ebike and a dirt-bike (and a road bike for that matter) and I guess I never thought the state would be squeezing me for the ebike.  That's some serious hypocrisy - save the environment by keeping my dirt-bike out of the woods (by riding my ebike instead) and then punishing me for it.  I'm all for doing my part to preserve the wilderness, I just wish it didn't cost me my own money every time.  The ebike was already my most expensive 2-wheeler.

I wonder if the lawmakers are hung up on the definition of ebike.  My ebike and most other ebikes out there are "pedal assist", not a motorcycle that uses a battery instead of gas.  If they want "electric motorcycles" to also have an ORV tag (or equivalent), then I guess I can understand that.  If my pedal assist bike needs an ORV tag, I'm opposed.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19940
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2023, 07:24:49 AM »
Maintain ebike trails….. ok, where are those, and who else is using those? So stupid! Total money grab, wouldn’t buy the pass, don’t buy the discover pass, and frankly not accepting any tickets for it.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7203
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2023, 07:26:30 AM »
At $5 per permit, this program is likely to cost the state more to implement than it will bring in.   First step toward registration?  Non-e-bikes are probably next.

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18404
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2023, 07:51:33 AM »
At $5 per permit, this program is likely to cost the state more to implement than it will bring in.   First step toward registration?  Non-e-bikes are probably next.

 :yeah:

I'd love to know what it costs the state to collect $5.
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21833
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2023, 07:54:57 AM »
As the number of in-state hunters declines, the revenues from hunters will decline. It will be an impact on both license sales and Pittman Robertson funding. I expect there will be more and more efforts to make up for the lost revenue that hunters previously provided.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25060
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2023, 08:38:59 AM »
As the number of in-state hunters declines, the revenues from hunters will decline. It will be an impact on both license sales and Pittman Robertson funding. I expect there will be more and more efforts to make up for the lost revenue that hunters previously provided.

Wouldnt be a problem is sportsmens discover passe moneys went to the wdfw instead of the Parks Department!
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline steeleywhopper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1680
  • Location: Snohomish co.
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2023, 08:42:38 AM »
Complete crap , next will be Tesla charge stations at trailheads

How about some Bakcou charging stations instead :chuckle:
Politicians like Jay Inslee are the reason we have the 2nd Amendment

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #12 on: January 27, 2023, 09:02:02 AM »


Remember when the Discovery Pass was a one year stop gap.

It was never intended to be a one year stop gap. It was initially intended to fully fund State Parks, but it never did.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25060
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2023, 09:05:47 AM »


Remember when the Discovery Pass was a one year stop gap.

It was never intended to be a one year stop gap. It was initially intended to fully fund State Parks, but it never did.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Because folks like Me refused to buy one and quit going to the state parks 1 or 2x a year. It is a horrible rob Peter to pay Paul plan. The Governor and Legislature do not find parks important enough to fund and yet they want a user that doesnt use the resource much to pay for it. Pox on them all!
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Henrydog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 1115
  • Location: Eastern Washington
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, RMEF, Phesants Forever
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2023, 09:20:08 AM »


Remember when the Discovery Pass was a one year stop gap.

It was never intended to be a one year stop gap. It was initially intended to fully fund State Parks, but it never did.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Interesting,  I stand corrected.  Looks like I have some digging to do this weekend

Offline templar021

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 70
  • Location: Greenbluff
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2023, 08:46:09 PM »
Hmmm, they won't allow ebikes on trails or gated roads and expect ebikes owners to pay for that....

Offline MADMAX

  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 9820
  • Location: Kitsap/Cle Elum
  • I like big bucks and I can not lie
Re: SB 5314 Would Require an E-Bike Pass for State Lands
« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2023, 08:57:21 PM »
Its Washington after all :chuckle:
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Mark Twain


I Ain't Captain Walker.
I'm The Guy Who Carries Mr. Dead In His Pocket


What would life be without the thrill of the hunt ?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Weatherby Vanguard vs. Browning x bolt by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 10:07:12 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 09:48:27 PM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:36:40 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 09:36:18 PM]


Pack wheel by millerwheeler
[Yesterday at 09:26:47 PM]


E WA waterfowl guide by 92xj
[Yesterday at 09:13:44 PM]


Where do the bulls go? by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 09:04:39 PM]


Anyone use game carts? by bigdub257
[Yesterday at 08:55:58 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:55:31 PM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by kramman
[Yesterday at 08:51:05 PM]


Mushroom ID Thread by MLHSN
[Yesterday at 08:50:05 PM]


No upland with dog during deer and elk season? by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:22:23 PM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by ganghis
[Yesterday at 07:11:45 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by swanderek
[Yesterday at 07:01:53 PM]


West side antler buyers by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 06:18:29 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 03:45:16 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Gonehuntin01
[Yesterday at 03:23:04 PM]


My new BB Gun by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 02:41:00 PM]


Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 02:11:14 PM]


Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case by Tbar
[Yesterday at 01:43:14 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal