Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Dan-o on June 17, 2023, 04:03:05 PMQuote from: huntnphool on June 16, 2023, 10:27:03 PM That buck has a 3” and 5” point and doesn’t meet some of your “big buck” criteria because it only scores 169”! Only 169”, but the 40”+ of mass and frame make it a giant…even with a 3” and 5” point! Had it matched the other sides, it would have been well over the 180 mark…but according to some on here, not a “big buck” I have several bucks over 180 in this state, topped the 200” mark last season, and have never looked at “score” while sizing up a buck. Again for me, it’s all about mass! Find a buck with mass and you have found a “mature” buck…which is all my family looks for. You got a 200" buck last season?No way!Pics or it didn't happen!(Disclaimer: I've seen the rack and even took some pics. It's a great buck.) Let's see it!! It's too bad a lot of guys dont put up pictures on here anymore. I wanna see all the picturesSent from my SM-G990U using Tapatalk
Quote from: huntnphool on June 16, 2023, 10:27:03 PM That buck has a 3” and 5” point and doesn’t meet some of your “big buck” criteria because it only scores 169”! Only 169”, but the 40”+ of mass and frame make it a giant…even with a 3” and 5” point! Had it matched the other sides, it would have been well over the 180 mark…but according to some on here, not a “big buck” I have several bucks over 180 in this state, topped the 200” mark last season, and have never looked at “score” while sizing up a buck. Again for me, it’s all about mass! Find a buck with mass and you have found a “mature” buck…which is all my family looks for. You got a 200" buck last season?No way!Pics or it didn't happen!(Disclaimer: I've seen the rack and even took some pics. It's a great buck.)
That buck has a 3” and 5” point and doesn’t meet some of your “big buck” criteria because it only scores 169”! Only 169”, but the 40”+ of mass and frame make it a giant…even with a 3” and 5” point! Had it matched the other sides, it would have been well over the 180 mark…but according to some on here, not a “big buck” I have several bucks over 180 in this state, topped the 200” mark last season, and have never looked at “score” while sizing up a buck. Again for me, it’s all about mass! Find a buck with mass and you have found a “mature” buck…which is all my family looks for.
Quote from: jjhunter on June 16, 2023, 12:28:24 PMI think when a deer gets a 180” frame is when they look/are big. What does that buck score in your avatar.If you don't mind me asking.I've never had a buck scored,or scored a buck,Just pictures and sports shows and stores where it shows the score.I also want to say it's bigger than it looks,cause your sitting next to it.And not two arm length behind it.
I think when a deer gets a 180” frame is when they look/are big.
Quote from: hunter399 on June 16, 2023, 01:05:36 PMQuote from: jjhunter on June 16, 2023, 12:28:24 PMI think when a deer gets a 180” frame is when they look/are big. What does that buck score in your avatar.If you don't mind me asking.I've never had a buck scored,or scored a buck,Just pictures and sports shows and stores where it shows the score.I also want to say it's bigger than it looks,cause your sitting next to it.And not two arm length behind it. I taped him at 185/186”. He’s a little weak in the back end, but pretty good everywhere else and 4.5” brows help for sure. 27” wide.
Quote from: huntnphool on June 16, 2023, 10:27:03 PM That buck has a 3” and 5” point and doesn’t meet some of your “big buck” criteria because it only scores 169”! Only 169”, but the 40”+ of mass and frame make it a giant…even with a 3” and 5” point! Had it matched the other sides, it would have been well over the 180 mark…but according to some on here, not a “big buck” I have several bucks over 180 in this state, topped the 200” mark last season, and have never looked at “score” while sizing up a buck. Again for me, it’s all about mass! Find a buck with mass and you have found a “mature” buck…which is all my family looks for. The amount of people that say they saw a 200” buck when in reality it was probably a 170-180 always blows my mind. Biggest buck I’ve seen in WA was probably 180-190. I’ve only seen real absolute giants in either MT or ID while hunting but they were on private land we didn’t have access too.
I usually pay attention to mass and the back forks on a mule deer. I always say mass trumps width. But that’s just my opinion.