Free: Contests & Raffles.
A lawsuit needs to be filed against the WDFW for discrimination against hunters and the desire that the bear population needs to be kept in check
Quote from: Skyvalhunter on August 16, 2023, 05:05:54 AMA lawsuit needs to be filed against the WDFW for discrimination against hunters and the desire that the bear population needs to be kept in checkI would suspect that a substantial portion of wdfw is getting tired of the rouge commission. If this keeps up 60 percent of wdfw will be out of a job in the next 5 years or re branded as climate change officer's tasked with cleaning pit toilets and gathering spotted frog crap to test as biofuel options..
Quote from: fishngamereaper on August 16, 2023, 08:47:30 AMQuote from: Skyvalhunter on August 16, 2023, 05:05:54 AMA lawsuit needs to be filed against the WDFW for discrimination against hunters and the desire that the bear population needs to be kept in checkI would suspect that a substantial portion of wdfw is getting tired of the rouge commission. If this keeps up 60 percent of wdfw will be out of a job in the next 5 years or re branded as climate change officer's tasked with cleaning pit toilets and gathering spotted frog crap to test as biofuel options..I'm not sure about that. I was just talking with a family member who was with them for about 10 years in fisheries and left last year, he said in that 10 years it went from most of his co-workers being hunters and fishermen to almost none. WDFW itself is being over taken by granola preservationists from the ground up, it's not just the commission
Can someone tell me where in the meeting they proposed to make elk hunting in wa draw only?I caught the bear and cougar "decoupling" from other fall season settings, and the bear "Whataboutism" so they can take those from us, but I missed the elk discussion.Thank you
Quote from: James on August 29, 2023, 12:03:51 PMCan someone tell me where in the meeting they proposed to make elk hunting in wa draw only?I caught the bear and cougar "decoupling" from other fall season settings, and the bear "Whataboutism" so they can take those from us, but I missed the elk discussion.Thank youIt was day three in the meetings (Saturday). They were talking with their lead bio about the game management plan and reg setting for the next three years. He replied that they would not have the studies done in time for their decisions in October to which several of the commissioners (Rowland and Smith) stated they didn't need the study to make a decision on bears and cats. Thursday was the day they spoke about the elk draw system, they were speaking with a bio, and they made the statement that they may look into limiting elk hunting to draw system. The bio replied that he is not aware of any Washington herds where that is a consideration for management, but they replied that they still wanted to have that as a consideration. It was following a conversation about avian flu concerns.
My question is, why are non residents of Washington allowed to comment on our hunting rules and seasons? Non residents hunters just need to abide by the seasons the WDFW set, they shouldn't have a say just as when we go to their state. But it's not out of state hunters I am concerned about. It is the Non resident ANTI hunting people, why are they allowed to have a say in what goes on here. It should be for residents only and a person should have to register showing residency before being allowed to comment at the meetings. We would still be outnumbered but it would be a lot closer playing field if it were only residents.