Free: Contests & Raffles.
Once side show Bob get in the governors house….guaranteed we will never see a spring season again. Be luck to keep the fall season.
Quote from: jrebel on September 12, 2023, 05:02:43 PMOnce side show Bob get in the governors house….guaranteed we will never see a spring season again. Be luck to keep the fall season. Bear and cougar season will be gone in the next 30 days. Elk will be permit only.
Quote from: Timberstalker on September 12, 2023, 08:18:16 PMQuote from: jrebel on September 12, 2023, 05:02:43 PMOnce side show Bob get in the governors house….guaranteed we will never see a spring season again. Be luck to keep the fall season. Bear and cougar season will be gone in the next 30 days. Elk will be permit only.No way man!!!Oil tag for bear ,cougar,now.
Only way for minimum chance of change is no one buys licenses in Wa…go hunt your dream out of state hunt if you can’t afford it I hate to say eat a year and see if anything changes otherwise Wa will not be a huntable state very soon unless all you want is yotes and they will end that to as fast as they can
"there will be no spring bear hunts in Washington until a new, substantiated management concern arises."If this is a direct quote from the commission, it is dereliction of duty...RCW 77.04.012 Mandate does not direct the commission to ONLY set a season based on a management need, on the contrary, It states "the commission shall ATTEMPT TO MAXIMIZE the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens"Any attempt to remove opportunity based on anything other than a conservation need, goes directly against the RCW. These statements are ammo for the current law suit.
Quote from: baker5150 on September 13, 2023, 07:07:06 AM"there will be no spring bear hunts in Washington until a new, substantiated management concern arises."If this is a direct quote from the commission, it is dereliction of duty...RCW 77.04.012 Mandate does not direct the commission to ONLY set a season based on a management need, on the contrary, It states "the commission shall ATTEMPT TO MAXIMIZE the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens"Any attempt to remove opportunity based on anything other than a conservation need, goes directly against the RCW. These statements are ammo for the current law suit. The fact that they are viewing hunting only as a management tool is very concerning to me. With that line of reasoning, what's to keep them from trying to eliminate all bird hunting while they're at it? Does anybody have an update on how the lawsuit is going?
Someone posted an article on this in a more liberal dominated forum and the comments were interesting to say the least. So many people think we should only hunt for population control or think we only cut the heads off. Don't even realize there are laws for meat retention. One person suggested they set a select amount of permits for specific areas where the timber damage or human conflict is occurring...that's exactly what it was before they took it away!!
And the result is a decline in everything they claim as precious.
Quote from: pickardjw on September 13, 2023, 08:46:32 AMSomeone posted an article on this in a more liberal dominated forum and the comments were interesting to say the least. So many people think we should only hunt for population control or think we only cut the heads off. Don't even realize there are laws for meat retention. One person suggested they set a select amount of permits for specific areas where the timber damage or human conflict is occurring...that's exactly what it was before they took it away!! This is a failing of sportsmen in this state. We allow the animal rights crowd to drive the narrative. We do not spend the time and money on it because we are consumed with our pursuit. We have to overcome our psychological inclination as individuals and band together. To animal rights activists this is natural, to us its like trying to herd cats.
Quote from: Special T on September 13, 2023, 09:08:05 AMQuote from: pickardjw on September 13, 2023, 08:46:32 AMSomeone posted an article on this in a more liberal dominated forum and the comments were interesting to say the least. So many people think we should only hunt for population control or think we only cut the heads off. Don't even realize there are laws for meat retention. One person suggested they set a select amount of permits for specific areas where the timber damage or human conflict is occurring...that's exactly what it was before they took it away!! This is a failing of sportsmen in this state. We allow the animal rights crowd to drive the narrative. We do not spend the time and money on it because we are consumed with our pursuit. We have to overcome our psychological inclination as individuals and band together. To animal rights activists this is natural, to us its like trying to herd cats.Respectfully, I disagree, Special T. When you have a governor who ignores state law by filling the Commission with animal rights activists because they filled his pockets with donations, the sportsmen and women are ignored completely by those who make the rules. This has been shown time and time again by extremists like Lorna Smith publicly refusing to even read the comments of pro-spring bear advocates. Spending time and money on this is being done by many...to no avail. Inslee doesn't care. The activists on the Commission don't care. They refuse to listen to the sportsmen and women, and even the biologists that are hired to give them data and recommendations for management. Turning on our own people isn't the answer, but I'm unsure what the answer is at this point.
We're not far apart and I do respect your informed opinion. But my main frustration is with the governor and his minions.
Its hard to focus on just one issue, let alone just our state. Federal move to expand lead bans on refuges. California trying to implement a 11% tax on law abiding ammo and gun purchasers. Oregon trying to make ALL killing of animals illegal. And then our state continuously taking hunting opportunities away. It can be seen as nothing more as an orchestrated attack on hunting and self subsistence nationally IMO...
It's time for everyone to start opening their wallets and start setting aside time to be part of stuff that will help fight these people and make a difference. I drove all the way up to the event last night in Arlington to help raise more funds for the Sportsmen's Alliance to litigate on our behalf. There is also the opportunity to show up and attend the commission meeting in Olympia on October 27th. We need thousands to go. Oh, and Semi Bird the next Governor of Washington State, was in attendance at the event last night as well. What does that tell you about what kind of advocate for hunters he would be?
It's funny how we hear about Bob Ferguson enforcing/prosecutingHigh capacity magazines.People like our commission are protected to the hilt.Pretty much break and change laws as they like.Whatever happened to doing away with the commission.Putting DNR commissioners in charge.I think at this point in the game ,we as hunters would be better off without a commission.I know for a fact that other states have merged wildlife with natural resources department. I don't hear about those states ending hunting.
Quote from: hunter399 on September 13, 2023, 03:58:58 PMIt's funny how we hear about Bob Ferguson enforcing/prosecutingHigh capacity magazines.People like our commission are protected to the hilt.Pretty much break and change laws as they like.Whatever happened to doing away with the commission.Putting DNR commissioners in charge.I think at this point in the game ,we as hunters would be better off without a commission.I know for a fact that other states have merged wildlife with natural resources department. I don't hear about those states ending hunting.It was a parks WDFW merger 15 ish years ago. It would be a wreck.We have not always had a commission. In 1995 referendum 45 created the Commission instead of the director being appointed by the Govenor. I have heard some rumblings about a move to repeal Ref 45 and delegate the authority to the legislature. I'm not sure that this is the best course of action. Forcing the Govenor to abide by RCW 77.04.040 is the best course of action.