collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Thermal vs. Night vision??  (Read 8301 times)

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3964
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Thermal vs. Night vision??
« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2024, 05:46:54 PM »
Tagging
Go hawks

Offline huntingfool7

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1723
  • Location: Puyallup, WA
  • Groups: huntingfool7
Re: Thermal vs. Night vision??
« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2024, 05:30:40 PM »
@jrebel   Which thermals are in the running?

I'm still not really sure.  Based on my research....mostly on youtube....I really like the pulsar scopes.  Still trying to figure out my budget as I have a lot of moving parts right now in my life and need to prioritize a few items. 

One of the scariest parts of purchasing a high dollar thermal is... I know nothing about them.  Literally never looked through one and no idea what I'm doing.  Lots of advise online and research being done to gather as much info as I can....but 5+K for a scope scares the hell out me.  Funny how I have no problem dropping 2-3K on a nightforce scope....but I know what they offer. 



Go with Pulsar.  They have a reputation for being the best at cutting through high humidity and fog.

Offline Luna butte

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 96
  • Location: East of Swale creek
Re: Thermal vs. Night vision??
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2024, 10:13:06 PM »
So I chose digital night vision a few years ago. I just couldn’t convince myself that I’d be able to tell the difference between a coyote and a border collie with thermal. I think having a thermal monocular for scanning and a nv scope is where I’m heading though.

Offline birdshooter1189

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 626
  • Location: Port Orchard
Re: Thermal vs. Night vision??
« Reply #33 on: February 05, 2024, 06:29:50 AM »
Good friends don't let their friends buy ATN brand thermal.  Mediocre/poor image quality and a reputation for not working right.

If you want budget thermal, look at AGM.

Luna, yes you have the right idea getting a thermal monocular for scanning and then use NV for the scope. 

I'd recommend a Pulsar Axion XQ35 Pro.  They are $1500.  $2000 if you get the LRF model.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Class A Diesel Motorhomes. by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 12:39:49 PM]


GMU 111 Aladdin Moose Hunt 2025! by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:35:06 PM]


Observatory quality bull rifle by Pathfinder101
[Today at 12:20:26 PM]


yakima north youth muzzy cow by Lokaybinnity
[Today at 11:41:00 AM]


Wanted: Deer hide. Mule deer or whitetail that's already tanned by elkboy
[Today at 11:31:58 AM]


Shadypass road / fs5900 closed by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:31:09 AM]


Car Covers, good idea or paint hazard? by Alchase
[Today at 11:26:17 AM]


High Hunt by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:20:27 AM]


Lolo Elk zone intel by Naches Sportsman
[Today at 09:09:53 AM]


2025 Mt. St. Helens success? by bowhuntersd
[Today at 08:36:59 AM]


Roadless Rule Public Comment by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 11:36:01 PM]


Manson unit - tips, tricks and honey holes! by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 09:22:08 PM]


20Ga Load Testing - Need different shells by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 09:17:53 PM]


Grouse/kids outdoors by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:13:16 PM]


Pack Llamas vs Pack Goats by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 09:11:11 PM]


Bow shows in Yakima area by Gobble Gobble
[Yesterday at 08:00:23 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal