Free: Contests & Raffles.
There would be more elk to hunt on the Yakama rez if they shot those skinny horses that are ruining all the forage. The Hanford herd has been over population objective for a long time and I'm glad there's some sort of step towards management other than giving out landowner tags to people who don't allow public access. That being said, over harvest would be a major mismanagement and clearly allowing offroading has terrible optics (which they probably aren't and that looks like a parking lot). I'm hoping that this stirs up the herd and allows them to disperse further. They should allow an archery tag inside the fence. That would be crazy sought after.
Calling it ancestral is where the line should be drawn. While ancestral just means passed on from someone above you in your family tree, it's misleading in this sense. Just call it a whoopty boony basher hunt...
If elk existed in area when the treaty was signed that's one thing. Hunting a species that did not exist when the treaty was signed is another. On another note I read where the tribal council is getting first shot so to speak on hunting. Lets see how that plays out
Quote from: idahohuntr on December 27, 2023, 05:34:14 PMTreaty RIGHTs...not 'privileges'. I think that's fundamental to understanding the topic.Treaty “wrongs” is more like it…
Treaty RIGHTs...not 'privileges'. I think that's fundamental to understanding the topic.
Whitefoot-Any idea how many cows the Yakamas have killed today to reduce the elk population in there?
Well does someone have any photos of the bulls they killed yet? There's has to be a truck driving around Wapato/ Toppenish by now with 3 or 4 racks out the back and huge "Air Jordan" sticker on the window.