collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: ONP Goat relocation outcome  (Read 8981 times)

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8784
  • Location: kitsap
Re: ONP Goat relocation outcome
« Reply #45 on: May 10, 2024, 07:12:44 AM »
The reality is they could of left the goats alone.

The justification for attempted relocation didn't merit giving those goats a death sentence in my book.

In a State that's having a difficult time managing any sort of wildlife you'd hope science and common sense says leave a thriving resource alone and add some protocols to manage it better. Instead of take a chance and hope they survive a mass relocation.
NPS was lead on NEPA. Did you comment? Did you attend the meetings and speak up? There was opportunities for all to be involved in the determination of their existence in the park. Many involved did not support eradicating them but really wanted to make the best of the situation.

Yes and yes
Unfortunately what's done is done
But I will stand firm that I disagree with the EIS and the associated CBI review that goats allegedly where not native to the area. 
And that removal was the only option....
A major factor of the management plan was human interaction. Maybe they should of taken a step in managing humans first....that park is overdue for a reduction in tourism..
I grew up in those mountains and the flood of people the last few years is mind blowing.

And just to be clear even if the relocation was a complete success I would still have the same opinion..those mountains deserve goats....


Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3043
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: ONP Goat relocation outcome
« Reply #46 on: May 10, 2024, 02:24:04 PM »
The reality is they could of left the goats alone.

The justification for attempted relocation didn't merit giving those goats a death sentence in my book.

In a State that's having a difficult time managing any sort of wildlife you'd hope science and common sense says leave a thriving resource alone and add some protocols to manage it better. Instead of take a chance and hope they survive a mass relocation.
NPS was lead on NEPA. Did you comment? Did you attend the meetings and speak up? There was opportunities for all to be involved in the determination of their existence in the park. Many involved did not support eradicating them but really wanted to make the best of the situation.

Yes and yes
Unfortunately what's done is done
But I will stand firm that I disagree with the EIS and the associated CBI review that goats allegedly where not native to the area. 
And that removal was the only option....
A major factor of the management plan was human interaction. Maybe they should of taken a step in managing humans first....that park is overdue for a reduction in tourism..
I grew up in those mountains and the flood of people the last few years is mind blowing.

And just to be clear even if the relocation was a complete success I would still have the same opinion..those mountains deserve goats....
No disagreement.  It is just tough to convey the effort by so many to try to salvage a NPS decision.  This was not on the WDFW or tribes. 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:59:50 PM]


Sockeye Numbers by The Butcher
[Today at 07:54:34 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 07:27:02 PM]


3 pintails by Dan-o
[Today at 07:20:12 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Today at 05:42:19 PM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by Alan K
[Today at 03:46:09 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Today at 12:43:12 PM]


2025 Crab! by trophyhunt
[Today at 11:09:27 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Today at 10:19:35 AM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Today at 09:55:24 AM]


If you've been following.... by HighlandLofts
[Today at 03:03:24 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal