collapse

Advertisement


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2543 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« on: May 15, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
Logged

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.
Logged

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 371
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 
Logged

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 103
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:
Logged

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1239
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?
Logged

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10671
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Quote from: CarbonHunter on May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 


* Advertisement

Quick Links

* Recent Topics

Long Island Hunt by pd
[Today at 03:45:44 PM]
Banded bluebill by shootem
[Today at 03:24:42 PM]
Four less by buglebuster
[Today at 02:46:31 PM]
“Recreational trappers”? by EnglishSetter
[Today at 12:56:37 PM]
Spicy garlic Elk Brats by Norman89
[Today at 12:47:34 PM]
Elk bratwurst by Norman89
[Today at 12:46:56 PM]
Elk breakfast sausage patty’s by Norman89
[Today at 12:46:03 PM]
35 whelen by CP
[Today at 11:20:43 AM]
GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 10:51:57 AM]
Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Tbar
[Today at 10:47:00 AM]
WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by C-Money
[Today at 07:30:24 AM]
Furbearer research project, samples requested, by lewy
[Yesterday at 10:48:09 PM]
Nice bachelor herd by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:41:23 PM]
Coyote hunting with dogs by metlhead
[Yesterday at 08:39:32 PM]
GSP Breeders- looking for GSP puppy by SureThing
[Yesterday at 08:19:53 PM]
Such cool looking animals by Falcon
[Yesterday at 08:18:18 PM]
Big changes to skamania county boat launching by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 06:15:56 PM]
2027 Pink Run Destroyed by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 02:25:10 PM]
Meet Kumpel by metlhead
[Yesterday at 12:04:28 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal