collapse

Advertisement


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2433 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« on: May 15, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
Logged

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.
Logged

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 
Logged

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:
Logged

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1218
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?
Logged

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Quote from: CarbonHunter on May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 


* Advertisement

Quick Links

* Recent Topics

Big buck, bad eye by Romulus1297
[Today at 12:20:40 AM]
2025 elk success thread!! by Westsideelkchaser
[Today at 12:14:14 AM]
2025 deer, let's see em! by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 10:58:23 PM]
Piebald blacktail fawn by Bearhunter308
[Yesterday at 10:43:03 PM]
Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by Roslyn Rambler
[Yesterday at 10:12:29 PM]
Idaho on the verge of outlawing by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 09:40:22 PM]
As He Lay by tonymiller7
[Yesterday at 09:07:27 PM]
Cougar and an elk same pic/video by redi
[Yesterday at 08:52:46 PM]
2025 blacktail rut thread by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 07:48:21 PM]
Flynn’s 1st rooster!!! by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 06:19:07 PM]
Entiat Modern hunting by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 03:58:02 PM]
Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 03:41:51 PM]
Chasing wild chickens. by goldenhtr
[Yesterday at 02:53:31 PM]
Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by jackelope
[Yesterday at 02:16:17 PM]
Bearpaw Season 2025 by Fatherof5
[Yesterday at 01:30:10 PM]
Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 10:15:23 AM]
CITES hide sealer and Fur Harvesters Receiving Agent info Pt 1 by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 08:35:28 AM]
Color phase fox by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 08:32:56 AM]
Mt. St. Helens Goat by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 08:19:02 AM]
GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 08:18:03 AM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal