collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2504 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1219
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10661
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Older SxS shotgun by Twispriver
[Today at 07:24:01 PM]


Wowzers by Schmalzfam
[Today at 07:07:26 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Today at 07:05:53 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by Schmalzfam
[Today at 06:58:48 PM]


Where can one find hides from hunters? by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 06:55:42 PM]


Bull moose...luck or ??? by Carltonhunt
[Today at 06:52:58 PM]


The Gutless Method by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 06:52:50 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by JakeLand
[Today at 06:50:05 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Hunting Cowboy
[Today at 06:24:31 PM]


As He Lay by Pathfinder101
[Today at 06:24:21 PM]


Meet Kumpel by elkboy
[Today at 06:18:56 PM]


Montana Elk Last Ditch Effort by Stein
[Today at 06:15:41 PM]


Aladdin unit 111 mule deer quality tag by Pathfinder101
[Today at 06:10:59 PM]


211 Mile Ambler Road Through The Brooks Range Approved by dwils233
[Today at 04:51:34 PM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by EnglishSetter
[Today at 03:08:14 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 01:51:59 PM]


My 2025 Wyoming trip by Falcon
[Today at 01:43:14 PM]


Break my heart - Archery World is closing by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:07:25 AM]


2024 Ford Edge Opinion/Bought a Chevrolet by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:14:27 AM]


What are you cooking? by Pnwrider
[Yesterday at 10:27:08 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal