collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2369 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1196
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10654
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Leopold Freedom RDS Mount by 509muley
[Today at 11:39:45 AM]


Snoqualmie valley elk poachers busted by Ridgeratt
[Today at 11:37:13 AM]


Butcher is not allowed to give your meat without proof of CWD test results. by hunter399
[Today at 11:34:03 AM]


Curious on you thought about this “tip” by Tinmaniac
[Today at 08:37:49 AM]


Anyone get a spike for archery? by pd
[Today at 08:34:55 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Crunchy
[Today at 08:29:57 AM]


Somebodies pissed by pd
[Yesterday at 09:25:40 PM]


Classification initiative by WDFW by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 07:57:31 PM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 07:33:04 PM]


Anyone know who carries Exide Marine batteries? by Westside88
[Yesterday at 07:16:39 PM]


Washington State Discover Pass increase October 1st by ganghis
[Yesterday at 06:31:37 PM]


GMU 336 by jason stevens
[Yesterday at 05:47:16 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 05:17:45 PM]


Smoked salmon by tracksoup
[Yesterday at 04:55:30 PM]


Success! by Mtnwalker
[Yesterday at 03:53:58 PM]


Mortgage Rates As Low As They've Been In A Year by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 01:48:19 PM]


Eggs. by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:54:35 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:51:32 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by nwwanderer
[Yesterday at 10:13:53 AM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by Ridgeratt
[Yesterday at 09:58:18 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal