collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2174 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 358
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1169
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10631
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Looking for people to hunt with. by JDArms1240
[Today at 01:12:51 PM]


Primer 157 vs 209 by EnglishSetter
[Today at 11:30:27 AM]


Evergreen youth livestock show and sale by nwwanderer
[Today at 11:06:58 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by ThunderRolls
[Today at 10:14:52 AM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by hunter399
[Today at 09:35:53 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by elkaholic123
[Today at 08:39:45 AM]


Rotator Cuff repair X 2 advice needed by Wood2Sawdust
[Today at 07:49:52 AM]


Upland Side by Side by OutHouse
[Today at 07:37:28 AM]


Tooth age on Quinault bull by nwwanderer
[Today at 06:54:44 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:45:13 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by metlhead
[Yesterday at 07:43:57 PM]


3 days for Kings by Stein
[Yesterday at 06:45:11 PM]


Kinda fun LH rimfire rifle project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 06:44:33 PM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 05:22:46 PM]


GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by GeoSwan
[Yesterday at 03:02:21 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 02:19:48 PM]


Dandy Bull by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 01:29:37 PM]


Tricer AD tripod by gee_unit360
[Yesterday at 12:40:45 PM]


How a Product That Changed Hunting FOREVER was invented in the 1980's by jrebel
[Yesterday at 11:28:44 AM]


Ten Years, and still plugging along by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 10:22:55 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal