collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2500 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1219
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10660
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Any MT deer updates? by jamesjett
[Today at 08:34:01 PM]


My 2025 Montana Buck by jamesjett
[Today at 08:31:10 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 08:18:42 PM]


Pants for wet brush? by ellensburgpo
[Today at 08:17:32 PM]


Couple crazy Montana bucks by Birdguy
[Today at 07:55:43 PM]


Pearygin Quality by Birdguy
[Today at 07:52:55 PM]


Bow shop around tacoma-seattle area? by hughjorgan
[Today at 06:33:03 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Face72
[Today at 05:54:56 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 05:13:34 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by trophyhunt
[Today at 04:52:27 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by nwwanderer
[Today at 04:09:12 PM]


Bobcat Scent Lures on the Westside by BearCreekCookBook
[Today at 02:19:16 PM]


My 2025 Wyoming trip by high_hunter
[Today at 12:34:29 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by dreadi
[Today at 11:35:48 AM]


What are you cooking? by JDArms1240
[Today at 09:27:53 AM]


New scope or not? by outdooraddict
[Today at 06:31:27 AM]


More than one shotgun? by jdb
[Today at 05:08:07 AM]


Fishin' with First-Timers by Martinhunter
[Today at 02:00:43 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Cylvertip
[Yesterday at 10:54:05 PM]


Making memories by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 10:29:43 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal