collapse

Advertisement


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2220 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« on: May 15, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
Logged

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.
Logged

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 363
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 
Logged

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:
Logged

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1178
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?
Logged

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10636
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Quote from: CarbonHunter on May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 


* Advertisement

Quick Links

* Recent Topics

Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by Bo_nimrod
[Today at 11:06:12 PM]
Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 09:52:46 PM]
Antelope next year? by jstone
[Today at 07:39:59 PM]
Pinks! by Stein
[Today at 06:33:42 PM]
Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by ghosthunter
[Today at 06:29:43 PM]
Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Today at 06:09:07 PM]
2025 OILS! by Whitenuckles
[Today at 05:16:45 PM]
2024 Quality Buck coming home by Whitenuckles
[Today at 05:10:28 PM]
Alaska 2025 by Whitenuckles
[Today at 05:09:18 PM]
Do folks run their refrigerators on Propane while towing their RV's? by huntandjeep
[Today at 04:11:54 PM]
Tooth age on Quinault bull by nwwanderer
[Today at 04:02:04 PM]
Skunks by Humptulips
[Today at 02:21:06 PM]
Ross Lake boat launch? by cjjcb
[Today at 02:06:21 PM]
Cougar Problems Toroda Creek Road Near Bodie by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 01:50:02 PM]
Muzzleloader scope options by huntnphool
[Today at 01:25:33 PM]
MOVED: Purebred Chesapeake Puppy by Woodchuck
[Today at 01:18:02 PM]
2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 05:38:00 AM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal