collapse

Advertisement


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2441 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« on: May 15, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
Logged

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.
Logged

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 
Logged

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:
Logged

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1218
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?
Logged

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Quote from: CarbonHunter on May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 


* Advertisement

Quick Links

* Recent Topics

Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by teanawayslayer
[Today at 12:50:07 PM]
E WA waterfowl guide by gallion_t
[Today at 12:45:45 PM]
Poll: Supreme Court will decide if 'habitual drug users' lose their gun rights by Pegasus
[Today at 12:43:31 PM]
Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by pianoman9701
[Today at 12:34:20 PM]
Weatherby Vanguard vs. Browning x bolt by D-Rock425
[Today at 11:40:37 AM]
Disappearing ink. by bustedoldman
[Today at 11:15:08 AM]
No upland with dog during deer and elk season? by GWP
[Today at 10:51:18 AM]
Possible record bull? by time2hunt
[Today at 10:48:01 AM]
Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat by codybear
[Today at 10:36:11 AM]
East Side by lovetogrouse
[Today at 10:25:04 AM]
West side antler buyers by IdeehoT
[Today at 09:08:16 AM]
Bearpaw Season 2025 by bearpaw
[Today at 08:47:12 AM]
Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by bearpaw
[Today at 08:32:14 AM]
2025 blacktail rut thread by dreadi
[Today at 08:09:53 AM]
Where do the bulls go? by Rob
[Today at 07:45:50 AM]
Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by fowl smacker
[Today at 06:27:55 AM]
Pack wheel by CP
[Today at 06:26:07 AM]
Anyone use game carts? by jhouckwsu
[Today at 05:59:36 AM]
GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:36:40 PM]
FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 09:36:18 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal