collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2224 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 364
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1178
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10637
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Happy opening day! by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 09:38:16 PM]


Opening morning by bornhunter
[Today at 09:36:39 PM]


Bowfishing on the Snake River by Machias
[Today at 09:11:19 PM]


Mamma's and babies by Brute
[Today at 08:38:48 PM]


Get out the Band-Aids and streri strips by Ridgeratt
[Today at 08:25:06 PM]


Pinks! by Stein
[Today at 08:20:08 PM]


Best 20 degree and under sleeping bags? by Stein
[Today at 08:18:23 PM]


Rats in RV roof by Ghost Hunter
[Today at 07:37:01 PM]


Any Rec Tec users here ? by rgcopk9
[Today at 06:58:44 PM]


Muckleshoot/white river forest hunting permits by bigtex
[Today at 05:21:47 PM]


Looks like it may get wet by ghosthunter
[Today at 04:46:17 PM]


Bait punishment? by hdshot
[Today at 04:35:54 PM]


small bears by Threewolves
[Today at 02:59:35 PM]


Montana Antelope Draw by Jimmy33
[Today at 02:41:41 PM]


Pork belly street tacos….. by jrebel
[Today at 10:03:22 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by 7t9cobra
[Today at 08:39:53 AM]


M1 garand info needed by Farmer72
[Today at 07:35:34 AM]


Bighorns & Brews event by GurrCentral
[Yesterday at 09:27:29 PM]


Lots of coho by hookr88
[Yesterday at 08:47:17 PM]


New bear hunter questions! by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 05:55:20 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal