collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2444 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1218
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 deer, let's see em! by Bearhunter308
[Today at 11:24:19 PM]


Called about Returned Alta Buck Permit by Limhangerslayer
[Today at 11:07:39 PM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by Mulie87
[Today at 11:03:42 PM]


Youth Cow Elk - Yakima South GMUs 364, 368 by Limhangerslayer
[Today at 10:58:51 PM]


Bullet performance 2025? by jeffro
[Today at 09:30:24 PM]


Taneum Elk Cow tag problem by Hiker82
[Today at 09:28:54 PM]


Bear That Hasn’t Missed Many Meals by jrebel
[Today at 09:12:53 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by X-Force
[Today at 08:22:35 PM]


Coupeville Highway pop-up blind by BigredRusch
[Today at 08:19:51 PM]


Big bear on trail cam Kitsap County by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 08:18:36 PM]


GMU 336 by MADMAX
[Today at 08:18:06 PM]


Recommendations for Pressure Washers by Fastass350
[Today at 08:15:00 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Crunchy
[Today at 08:12:44 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by X-Force
[Today at 08:07:09 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by blindluck
[Today at 07:54:04 PM]


Gutpile Care, yes there is such a thing. by highcountry_hunter
[Today at 07:50:37 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by shotguunar
[Today at 07:36:52 PM]


Auto repair shop Spokane by walt
[Today at 04:13:25 PM]


Calling Bears by hunter399
[Today at 03:13:37 PM]


Pearygin Quality by Schmalzfam
[Today at 02:08:32 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal