collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2215 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 363
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1178
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Browning X Bolt sticky stock by JKEEN33
[Today at 01:31:06 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 01:09:43 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by tdot24
[Today at 12:37:30 PM]


2025 Area 9 King Opener by CP
[Today at 11:53:21 AM]


Bonaparte Lake by TeacherMan
[Today at 10:17:00 AM]


Pocket Carry by hookr88
[Today at 09:48:30 AM]


Grouse in Vail? by Alan K
[Today at 09:28:46 AM]


Rabbits looking good so far! by Goshawk
[Today at 09:16:08 AM]


Game scouting in Vail for 2025. Not looking too good so far. by Goshawk
[Today at 09:04:01 AM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by JDArms1240
[Today at 06:12:34 AM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by trophyhunt
[Today at 05:59:13 AM]


Good day of steelhead fishing! by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 10:49:23 PM]


8 year old attacked in 2023 ooops by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 08:32:17 PM]


Live bait albacore charter by hiway_99
[Yesterday at 07:10:28 PM]


Seeking packer OnCall for early archery unit 328 Naneum/Colockum by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 06:53:06 PM]


Surprise quality deer tag by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 06:01:07 PM]


Antelope next year? by Stein
[Yesterday at 05:52:08 PM]


New to bear hunting by ZaneHunts
[Yesterday at 05:35:10 PM]


Idaho unit 5 2025. Nov-ish by leonpeon2
[Yesterday at 03:42:59 PM]


3 pintails by hdshot
[Yesterday at 02:16:04 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal