collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2471 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1218
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10658
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 blacktail rut thread by lazydrifter
[Today at 04:48:32 PM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by waoutdoorsman
[Today at 04:26:45 PM]


Open seat thread (waterfowl) by Elk_Guapo
[Today at 04:12:31 PM]


Softopper Canopies by dwils233
[Today at 03:44:17 PM]


Late huckelberry bull by trophyhunt
[Today at 03:33:35 PM]


Share your out of state experience by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 03:18:08 PM]


Archery Deer late Nachez/Nile Dogs on Deer by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 03:01:04 PM]


Turkey Summer Sausage by Russ McDonald
[Today at 12:20:20 PM]


Flynn’s Hunts!!! by MR5x5
[Today at 11:04:14 AM]


Panhandle whitetail dates by leonpeon2
[Today at 10:57:52 AM]


Drew Pogue Quality by no.cen.wa
[Today at 09:59:25 AM]


Buck to Doe Ratio by dilleytech
[Today at 09:51:05 AM]


Xlr element vs mdt hnt26 by edaniels97
[Today at 09:12:54 AM]


Sturgeon Set-ups by dilleytech
[Today at 08:34:08 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by skagitsteel
[Today at 08:21:54 AM]


328/329 reports by teanawayslayer
[Today at 07:50:12 AM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by str8meat
[Yesterday at 11:35:51 PM]


Unit 130/ 139 by JCBrown
[Yesterday at 10:23:16 PM]


My first Bobcat by BelongsOutside
[Yesterday at 10:06:04 PM]


My first blacktail! by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:41:08 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal