collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2604 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3317
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 374
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 108
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1278
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10681
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Canadian Invasion by wadu1
[Today at 01:25:01 PM]


Washington Euro mounting Plaque*free give away for youth hunter* by D-Rock425
[Today at 01:17:14 PM]


Idaho Panhandle B Elk 30 by TeacherMan
[Today at 01:14:59 PM]


Wild Turkey Federation Snohomish County Event by seaduckhunter
[Today at 12:49:17 PM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by Big6bull
[Today at 12:44:21 PM]


Idaho deer 2026. Let’s go!! by Turner89
[Today at 12:35:11 PM]


Most effective electronic calls for coyotes? by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 11:01:37 AM]


Big game season proposals by bobcat
[Today at 10:35:07 AM]


Idaho Selway A pack out camps by Kool-aid
[Today at 10:27:36 AM]


Black and tans by Machias
[Today at 10:26:46 AM]


Custom Laminate Design Handcalls by jeffro
[Today at 02:51:58 AM]


Catch photo trap action by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 06:30:47 PM]


Smart big beavers by Rnartillery
[Yesterday at 05:32:06 PM]


Got a lion today by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 03:06:57 PM]


2 more Laminate hand calls by rainshadow1
[Yesterday at 02:47:06 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 01:35:18 PM]


The "King" by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 12:07:55 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal