collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2607 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3317
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 374
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 108
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1279
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10681
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Dorsal skinned beaver by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 11:03:39 PM]


Idaho Selway A pack out camps by 2MANY
[Yesterday at 08:43:19 PM]


Ruger Single Six, extra cylinders,.22 and .22 winmag by cdriver
[Yesterday at 08:40:22 PM]


Big game season proposals by CarbonHunter
[Yesterday at 07:58:23 PM]


Washington Euro mounting Plaque*free give away for youth hunter* by millerwheeler
[Yesterday at 07:14:59 PM]


Most effective electronic calls for coyotes? by furbearer365
[Yesterday at 07:14:13 PM]


Pulsar Telos XL50 LRF ForSale by Thermal Predator Control
[Yesterday at 06:14:58 PM]


Mineral Lake 2011 by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 05:39:41 PM]


Canadian Invasion by baldopepper
[Yesterday at 05:11:04 PM]


Report Wolf Sightings Here - Hunting-Washington Wolf Count 158+ by BIGDOG253
[Yesterday at 03:42:32 PM]


Idaho Panhandle B Elk 30 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 01:14:59 PM]


Wild Turkey Federation Snohomish County Event by seaduckhunter
[Yesterday at 12:49:17 PM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by Big6bull
[Yesterday at 12:44:21 PM]


Idaho deer 2026. Let’s go!! by Turner89
[Yesterday at 12:35:11 PM]


Black and tans by Machias
[Yesterday at 10:26:46 AM]


Custom Laminate Design Handcalls by jeffro
[Yesterday at 02:51:58 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal