collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2419 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1205
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bear Snare? by Wendego716
[Today at 08:37:51 AM]


Nile bull hunters by lee
[Today at 07:19:19 AM]


Panhandle whitetail dates by Jimmy33
[Today at 06:57:53 AM]


Talking About Barely Legal by Alan K
[Today at 06:15:14 AM]


GMU 111 Aladdin Moose Hunt 2025! by HillHound
[Today at 05:06:48 AM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by JDHasty
[Today at 03:35:32 AM]


Do you need a place to stay??? Methow / Alta / Chiliwist? by BigredRusch
[Yesterday at 10:02:14 PM]


Japanese Kei truck? by Farmer72
[Yesterday at 09:34:28 PM]


climbing stick users by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 08:15:22 PM]


WHAT DID YOUR TRUCK COST NEW? by N7XW
[Yesterday at 07:40:02 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 07:28:27 PM]


Quality tag by lewy
[Yesterday at 06:45:36 PM]


Goose hunting in Spokane by Badhabit
[Yesterday at 05:50:41 PM]


.45 kentucky rifle and patched roundballs by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 05:10:57 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 03:23:24 PM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by Wolfdog2314
[Yesterday at 02:41:03 PM]


Smoked salmon by mikey549
[Yesterday at 02:17:02 PM]


Unit 346 little naches by jrebel
[Yesterday at 01:46:49 PM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 12:14:46 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:39:56 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal