collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2535 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 370
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 103
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1239
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10671
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Big changes to skamania county boat launching by Magnum_Willys
[Today at 04:30:37 AM]


Question about Hancock Timber Co Eastside by hunter399
[Today at 12:14:09 AM]


2027 Pink Run Destroyed by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:49:24 PM]


Update repair complete Who knows Stihl messed up and cooked my 044 by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:34:53 PM]


F150 Tire/Wheel Guys by elksnout
[Yesterday at 08:55:57 PM]


Furbearer research project, samples requested, by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 08:41:11 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Yesterday at 06:25:21 PM]


Coyote hunting GMU 501 by metlhead
[Yesterday at 05:17:39 PM]


Building out duck boat by Badhabit
[Yesterday at 05:09:00 PM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by blindluck
[Yesterday at 04:30:23 PM]


Curvy Damascus Utility Fighter by rainshadow1
[Yesterday at 11:58:55 AM]


The Rack by Mtnwalker
[Yesterday at 09:45:02 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal