collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2453 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1218
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

The One by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 11:02:35 PM]


Bullet performance 2025? by highcountry_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:33:11 PM]


Who knows Stihl Chainsaws? messed up and cooked my 044 hoping to save/rebuild by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:55:51 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 09:48:14 PM]


Wall Tents Tips and Tricks by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:28:36 PM]


Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by 2MANY
[Yesterday at 09:23:11 PM]


Blue mountains deer permit by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:18:11 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 08:18:22 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by hunter399
[Yesterday at 07:16:32 PM]


DIY Cascade Roosevelt Bull Taxidermy Project by Hunting Cowboy
[Yesterday at 05:37:03 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 04:10:38 PM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 03:52:47 PM]


Aladdin unit 111 mule deer quality tag by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 03:21:16 PM]


Blood trailing in the rain by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 03:06:53 PM]


Youth Cow Elk - Yakima South GMUs 364, 368 by knh
[Yesterday at 01:54:35 PM]


2025 General Season Rifle Hunt VIDEO. by pashok23
[Yesterday at 01:39:38 PM]


Skagit Question by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 01:35:18 PM]


Autumn colors by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 01:00:08 PM]


Forklifts.....school me by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 11:51:41 AM]


Dodge 48re transmission recommendations by Joyce
[Yesterday at 10:34:17 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal