collapse

Advertisement


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2742 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« on: May 15, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
Logged

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3317
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.
Logged

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 384
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 
Logged

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 113
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:
Logged

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1303
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?
Logged

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10691
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Quote from: CarbonHunter on May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 


* Advertisement

Quick Links

* Recent Topics

me and my son headed east for our 2nd turkey season by shorthair15
[Yesterday at 10:52:59 PM]
How to edit title by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 10:33:22 PM]
Discretion !!! by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 10:23:25 PM]
Attention Sportsmen and Women: Presence needed at April WDFW Commission meeting by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 09:26:29 PM]
E tags by X-Force
[Yesterday at 08:12:35 PM]
2026 turkey season! by brewzer13
[Yesterday at 07:03:21 PM]
WA wolf population increases 17%. by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 05:41:12 PM]
Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 05:28:33 PM]
Mushroom ID Thread by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 04:02:06 PM]
You Bear Slayers by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 03:10:33 PM]
WA 2nd Bear Tag. Is it still a thing? by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 03:01:45 PM]
6.5 PRC advice by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 02:32:41 PM]
Blacktail Trophy Tactics Hunting Event: Free for Veterans/Active Duty by silverdalesauer
[Yesterday at 09:42:17 AM]
Looking for Your Help - Donate Used or New Gear by silverdalesauer
[Yesterday at 09:24:31 AM]
Old account recovery by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:08:24 AM]
Hoof rot by HikerHunter
[Yesterday at 08:23:42 AM]
Best Turkey Recipes by erronulvin
[Yesterday at 07:49:22 AM]
Any fans of the 35 Rem, 358 Win, 35 Whelen, 9.3x62, or 45-70? by The Big Game Hunter
[Yesterday at 06:00:15 AM]
Bear ID certification by Scruffy
[April 19, 2026, 11:37:29 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal