collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 22949 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 564
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9161
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3082
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9728
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Cat on a hot tin roof ? by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 11:02:06 PM]


Special Hunt Submit not working? by kramman
[Yesterday at 09:57:24 PM]


Predator Derby 2026!? by VickGar
[Yesterday at 09:47:09 PM]


That’ll buff right out by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 09:47:07 PM]


Colorado Deer by jae
[Yesterday at 09:01:49 PM]


Offseason nest raiders. by huntingfool7
[Yesterday at 08:35:21 PM]


Printed regs contain date errors for South Central Region elk special hunts by jason stevens
[Yesterday at 07:23:21 PM]


date of draw results in 2025 by jason stevens
[Yesterday at 06:09:49 PM]


$1,500 Dollar Summer Raffle American Legion Post #14 by b0bbyg
[Yesterday at 04:20:50 PM]


Slide Ridge/Shadypass pack by Archy99
[Yesterday at 04:14:47 PM]


Canada duck factory paying the price for AI. by hdshot
[Yesterday at 03:55:49 PM]


Riveting my boat by wadu1
[Yesterday at 02:07:24 PM]


Port Gamble - Poulsbo Trip Advise by Alchase
[Yesterday at 12:39:40 PM]


Alkali/Yakima Training Center: Outdoor Recreation Policy by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 12:12:17 PM]


Wyoming 2026, who's in? by X-Force
[May 26, 2026, 08:30:06 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal