collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 9447 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 460
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8644
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3033
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9606
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:38:59 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by finnman
[Yesterday at 09:54:56 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by finnman
[Yesterday at 09:39:10 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Jpmiller
[Yesterday at 09:28:01 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 07:10:40 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by jamesjett
[Yesterday at 06:53:04 PM]


Antlerless Moose more than once? by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 06:35:51 PM]


Guessing there will be a drop in whitatail archers by hunter399
[Yesterday at 02:22:27 PM]


WDFW falsely advertising preference points by dreamingbig
[Yesterday at 01:36:50 PM]


Youth turkey hunt. by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 09:16:13 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal