collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 17561 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 482
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9012
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3069
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9702
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Charcuterie by Angry Perch
[Today at 10:36:59 AM]


Prince of Wales Spring Bear 2026 by Chesapeake
[Today at 09:22:22 AM]


Wyoming North Central by Moose Master
[Today at 09:12:34 AM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by ACCUBOND
[Today at 09:07:03 AM]


CWD in ferry county by kodiak06
[Today at 08:43:07 AM]


Flooded Corn: Senator Calls USFW To Conduct Formal Study by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Today at 08:23:17 AM]


public land blacktail traditional archer by pd
[Today at 04:18:15 AM]


Benchmade by Rat44
[Today at 01:46:48 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 08:47:34 PM]


Idaho deer 2026. Let’s go!! by 762Gunner
[Yesterday at 05:49:25 PM]


Know Where To Hunt Club by YoungFowler
[Yesterday at 05:33:55 PM]


WANTED- Barren Ground Caribou Cape by BlackRiverTaxidermy
[Yesterday at 04:10:48 PM]


eastside turkey hunting area secured access by mboyle0828
[Yesterday at 03:48:27 PM]


Form 1 Engraving Services by Sundance
[Yesterday at 02:58:57 PM]


6x51R by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 12:34:29 PM]


Special vs. Regular Pronghorn in WY by Jimmy33
[Yesterday at 12:14:12 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal