collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 18197 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 529
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9049
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3077
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9708
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Pacific Northwest - The Beautiful Cookbook by Remnar
[Today at 09:23:02 PM]


Bleeding a sturgeon? by buglebuster
[Today at 09:18:36 PM]


Cage Trapping Bobcats by 3nails
[Today at 09:11:49 PM]


Fall bear season to be minimized by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:23 PM]


Texas Axis Deer Hunting by jstone
[Today at 06:53:23 PM]


School me on cast iron! by huntingfool7
[Today at 05:41:41 PM]


bc style down rigger rod by hunter_sean08
[Today at 05:22:57 PM]


Arizona credit card hits by mp.hunter
[Today at 04:19:57 PM]


Is this barrel bent? by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 03:29:37 PM]


turkey hunting question series - 7 by birddogdad
[Today at 01:06:26 PM]


Custom rifles by slm9s
[Today at 10:36:52 AM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:01:16 AM]


Are there wolves in the Olympic Mountains, and the Olympic National Park? by HighlandLofts
[Today at 03:33:00 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal