collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 17889 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 501
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9029
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3074
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9707
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Some nice animals from last season by Pathfinder101
[Today at 11:20:11 AM]


turkey hunting question series - question 3 by Dan-o
[Today at 10:42:20 AM]


Looking for Your Help - Donate Used or New Gear by silverdalesauer
[Today at 10:35:54 AM]


Oregon antelope by boneaddict
[Today at 10:34:27 AM]


turkey hunting question series - question 2 by birddogdad
[Today at 10:05:31 AM]


when should i give up on a turkey and move on? by birddogdad
[Today at 10:02:25 AM]


blacktail deer bait by 270Flat
[Today at 10:00:19 AM]


CRSSE license by LayMdown
[Today at 08:30:51 AM]


North Idaho Houndsmen Association Banquet by Machias
[Today at 08:11:25 AM]


First time coyote hunting by birdshooter1189
[Today at 06:47:57 AM]


Birds are gobbling hard now! by bearpaw
[Today at 06:16:17 AM]


Looking for help with Cummins 6CTA (8.3 liter medium duty diesel) by Skillet
[Yesterday at 11:05:51 PM]


Anyone tried the .338 ARC by FlyFish360
[Yesterday at 08:45:04 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:17:46 PM]


Wyoming 2026, who's in? by HoytHunter24
[Yesterday at 04:04:10 PM]


Vet's day finale by metlhead
[Yesterday at 03:09:37 PM]


R.I.P. ~ Gary York by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 10:58:04 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal