collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 22985 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 566
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9163
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3082
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9728
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Offseason nest raiders. by MR5x5
[Today at 04:30:26 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by pickardjw
[Today at 04:08:56 PM]


Halibut and albacore gear by dilleytech
[Today at 03:39:26 PM]


Getting boat on plane. by dilleytech
[Today at 03:35:39 PM]


Owl by Pegasus
[Today at 03:15:18 PM]


Ol shotty resto by hookr88
[Today at 03:15:09 PM]


Second Choice by grundy53
[Today at 02:27:19 PM]


Oregon live raffle draw 2026 by mp.hunter
[Today at 01:48:13 PM]


Predator Derby 2026!? by bearpaw
[Today at 01:42:41 PM]


Site is slow - by CP
[Today at 01:22:41 PM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by BigCountryRog
[Today at 01:15:46 PM]


Special Hunt Submit not working? by throttlejocky20
[Today at 12:37:49 PM]


2026 Spring Bear, North Idaho by Loup Loup
[Today at 11:17:22 AM]


Scary moment by brokentrail
[Today at 10:50:20 AM]


$1,500 Dollar Summer Raffle American Legion Post #14 by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:22:16 AM]


Colorado Deer by BeerBugler
[Today at 07:48:58 AM]


Colorado Elk by jae
[Today at 07:38:30 AM]


date of draw results in 2025 by dilleytech
[Today at 06:27:32 AM]


Cat on a hot tin roof ? by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 11:02:06 PM]


That’ll buff right out by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 09:47:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal