collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 15833 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 475
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8873
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3066
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9672
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Quality tag by Romulus1297
[Today at 12:39:55 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 11:20:51 PM]


Talking About Barely Legal by Rob Allen
[Yesterday at 10:51:34 PM]


Dehydrating Chantrelles by RobinHoodlum
[Yesterday at 10:39:08 PM]


2025 opener by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 09:56:14 PM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 09:06:30 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by pickardjw
[Yesterday at 09:05:28 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 07:42:22 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by hunter399
[Yesterday at 07:16:08 PM]


Japanese Kei truck? by Caseyd
[Yesterday at 06:06:01 PM]


CCW/SA small Supreme Court win+breaking down the WWF "Not my WDFW" Campaign by Firstgenhunter
[Yesterday at 05:42:36 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 05:30:31 PM]


Nile bull hunters by lee
[Yesterday at 04:31:32 PM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by dreadi
[Yesterday at 03:07:26 PM]


Bear Snare? by danderson
[Yesterday at 01:42:34 PM]


Panhandle whitetail dates by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 12:51:25 PM]


Westside Muzzy Elk Habitat Help and Rut Help by stur4351@gmail.com
[Yesterday at 10:41:46 AM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by Antlershed
[Yesterday at 09:17:49 AM]


Do you need a place to stay??? Methow / Alta / Chiliwist? by ASHQUACK
[Yesterday at 08:55:41 AM]


GMU 111 Aladdin Moose Hunt 2025! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 05:06:48 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal