collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 578 Indian land  (Read 3995 times)

Offline Whitefoot

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 264
  • Location: YAKAMA NATION
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2024, 08:59:38 AM »
Everybody should be in tune with what’s going on in 578 with the Yakima tribe trying to take over the majority of this unit voices need to be heard and or some type of presence.

Yakama is the tribe.  Yakima you're talking about the town.
Cayusm

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 497
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
What about the town yakimas 170 miles away from Glenwood. What’s wrong with the 800,000 acres that tribe already has

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5598
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #17 on: November 13, 2024, 04:19:11 PM »
What about the town yakimas 170 miles away from Glenwood. What’s wrong with the 800,000 acres that tribe already has

They wanted the land the treaty apparently gave them, not less.  Who wouldn’t ?

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 497
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #18 on: November 13, 2024, 05:20:04 PM »
That dispute was settled and I think $2.1 million was given to the tribe to relinquish all rights to what we refer to as Tract D, which takes in Glenwood, and so they accepted the money, ceded all rights to it.

Offline BUTTER

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 363
  • Location: CAMAS
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #19 on: November 22, 2024, 08:07:52 PM »
Not sure where your getting your news from Shooter but this is old news. The supreme court made the ruling it's a done deal. It's already over they have been allowing the state to continue allowing hunting on the land until approx. this coming season

Offline Wazukie

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2674
  • Location: The Woods
  • Groups: NRA
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2024, 09:40:18 PM »
@Shooter4 who are your grandparents?  Wondering because I live here in Trac D.  As decided a couple years back, the Glenwood Valley is within the interior bounderies of the Yakima Nation.  Outside of the decades old water issue, I've seen no changes in hunting or fishing on private or state land unless you count cats, bears, wolfs and hoof rot :)
Matthew 6:33

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Looking for English Pointer pup (Elhew and/or Guard Rail lines) by Shannon
[Today at 08:11:19 AM]


New fisher looking to catch some pinks this year by Bullkllr
[Today at 08:04:24 AM]


Jetty Fishing by HntnFsh
[Today at 05:39:22 AM]


Brittany breeders by Wingin it
[Yesterday at 10:31:28 PM]


Best gear shop? by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 09:49:24 PM]


Utah backdoor by baldopepper
[Yesterday at 08:24:45 PM]


Halibut fishing by hiway_99
[Yesterday at 08:17:27 PM]


1oz cannon balls by Angus
[Yesterday at 07:01:53 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by muleyslayer
[Yesterday at 06:56:05 PM]


Back up camera by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 05:35:27 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 01:58:27 PM]


Nevada Results by Beastmonger1987
[Yesterday at 01:09:33 PM]


Colorado Results by Beastmonger1987
[Yesterday at 01:07:19 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by Alchase
[Yesterday at 11:00:13 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal