collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 578 Indian land  (Read 6388 times)

Offline Whitefoot

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 280
  • Location: YAKAMA NATION
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2024, 08:59:38 AM »
Everybody should be in tune with what’s going on in 578 with the Yakima tribe trying to take over the majority of this unit voices need to be heard and or some type of presence.

Yakama is the tribe.  Yakima you're talking about the town.
Cayusm

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
What about the town yakimas 170 miles away from Glenwood. What’s wrong with the 800,000 acres that tribe already has

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5627
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #17 on: November 13, 2024, 04:19:11 PM »
What about the town yakimas 170 miles away from Glenwood. What’s wrong with the 800,000 acres that tribe already has

They wanted the land the treaty apparently gave them, not less.  Who wouldn’t ?

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #18 on: November 13, 2024, 05:20:04 PM »
That dispute was settled and I think $2.1 million was given to the tribe to relinquish all rights to what we refer to as Tract D, which takes in Glenwood, and so they accepted the money, ceded all rights to it.

Offline BUTTER

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 367
  • Location: CAMAS
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #19 on: November 22, 2024, 08:07:52 PM »
Not sure where your getting your news from Shooter but this is old news. The supreme court made the ruling it's a done deal. It's already over they have been allowing the state to continue allowing hunting on the land until approx. this coming season

Offline Wazukie

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2673
  • Location: The Woods
  • Groups: NRA
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2024, 09:40:18 PM »
@Shooter4 who are your grandparents?  Wondering because I live here in Trac D.  As decided a couple years back, the Glenwood Valley is within the interior bounderies of the Yakima Nation.  Outside of the decades old water issue, I've seen no changes in hunting or fishing on private or state land unless you count cats, bears, wolfs and hoof rot :)
Matthew 6:33

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Lost in the Fog by eap7899
[Yesterday at 11:54:52 PM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by 257 Wby Mag
[Yesterday at 11:15:11 PM]


Big game season proposals by jstone
[Yesterday at 09:28:47 PM]


Not fact checked, but I can relate. by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 09:00:33 PM]


Elk camp upgrade/luxury item? by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 08:37:23 PM]


2026 Sheds “Found one” by Roslyn Rambler
[Yesterday at 07:19:41 PM]


New Zealand in May by Torrent50
[Yesterday at 02:50:58 PM]


Morels 26 by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 01:37:52 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 12:25:34 PM]


Spring! by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 12:10:04 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 10:38:43 AM]


Arrow preference by mburrows
[Yesterday at 05:53:21 AM]


Muzzle loading shotguns? Educate me by Night goat
[March 23, 2026, 11:29:17 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal