collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 578 Indian land  (Read 6396 times)

Offline Whitefoot

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 280
  • Location: YAKAMA NATION
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2024, 08:59:38 AM »
Everybody should be in tune with what’s going on in 578 with the Yakima tribe trying to take over the majority of this unit voices need to be heard and or some type of presence.

Yakama is the tribe.  Yakima you're talking about the town.
Cayusm

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
What about the town yakimas 170 miles away from Glenwood. What’s wrong with the 800,000 acres that tribe already has

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5628
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #17 on: November 13, 2024, 04:19:11 PM »
What about the town yakimas 170 miles away from Glenwood. What’s wrong with the 800,000 acres that tribe already has

They wanted the land the treaty apparently gave them, not less.  Who wouldn’t ?

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #18 on: November 13, 2024, 05:20:04 PM »
That dispute was settled and I think $2.1 million was given to the tribe to relinquish all rights to what we refer to as Tract D, which takes in Glenwood, and so they accepted the money, ceded all rights to it.

Offline BUTTER

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 367
  • Location: CAMAS
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #19 on: November 22, 2024, 08:07:52 PM »
Not sure where your getting your news from Shooter but this is old news. The supreme court made the ruling it's a done deal. It's already over they have been allowing the state to continue allowing hunting on the land until approx. this coming season

Offline Wazukie

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2673
  • Location: The Woods
  • Groups: NRA
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2024, 09:40:18 PM »
@Shooter4 who are your grandparents?  Wondering because I live here in Trac D.  As decided a couple years back, the Glenwood Valley is within the interior bounderies of the Yakima Nation.  Outside of the decades old water issue, I've seen no changes in hunting or fishing on private or state land unless you count cats, bears, wolfs and hoof rot :)
Matthew 6:33

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Spring bear 2026 by luvmystang67
[Today at 02:41:16 PM]


Big game season proposals by trophyhunt
[Today at 02:34:04 PM]


Elk camp upgrade/luxury item? by tracksoup
[Today at 02:19:34 PM]


Gongs? by CP
[Today at 02:19:09 PM]


2026 Sheds “Found one” by Loup Loup
[Today at 01:02:44 PM]


My pics from over the years by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 12:30:35 PM]


Not fact checked, but I can relate. by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:56:57 AM]


Spring Idaho by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 11:37:37 AM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by IdeehoT
[Today at 10:50:39 AM]


Curvy Damascus Utility Fighter by rainshadow1
[Today at 10:39:20 AM]


Swap Saltwater fishing for private ground hunting by washingtonmuley
[Today at 09:16:46 AM]


First gen M&P trigger question by jdb
[Today at 05:33:41 AM]


Lost in the Fog by eap7899
[Yesterday at 11:54:52 PM]


New Zealand in May by Torrent50
[Yesterday at 02:50:58 PM]


Morels 26 by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 01:37:52 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 12:25:34 PM]


Spring! by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 12:10:04 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 10:38:43 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal