collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 578 Indian land  (Read 4678 times)

Online Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
578 Indian land
« on: November 12, 2024, 12:42:50 PM »
Everybody should be in tune with what’s going on in 578 with the Yakima tribe trying to take over the majority of this unit voices need to be heard and or some type of presence.

Online Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2024, 12:44:44 PM »
I’m sorry but all we have been doing for these tribes is give give give when will it be enough?

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2819
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2024, 01:25:14 PM »
What is going on?  Fill us in!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

Online Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2024, 02:57:16 PM »
Apparently a treaty got “dug up” claiming they own half of 578 decisions are made soon which would in turn mean damn near half of 578 will be Yakima tribe land

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6390
  • Location: Toledo
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2024, 03:00:05 PM »
Is this part of what already happened down by Goldendale?

Online Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2024, 03:25:45 PM »
Is this part of what already happened down by Goldendale?
still transpiring

Offline Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2389
  • Location: Selah
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2024, 03:42:28 PM »
If you're going to start a thread on this it would be nice if you could include some actual information. I was under the impression this was decided by the Supreme Court a couple years back...

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6390
  • Location: Toledo
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2024, 03:45:22 PM »
 :yeah:

Online Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2024, 04:05:08 PM »
It is still in Supreme Court final decisions are being made within the next couple months

Online Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2024, 04:09:36 PM »
All this should have been a done deal back in the '60s,That dispute was settled and I think $2.1 million was given to the tribe to relinquish all rights to what we refer to as Tract D, which takes in Glenwood, and so they accepted the money, ceded all rights to it.

Offline JakeLand

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4573
  • Location: Wet side
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2024, 05:26:35 PM »
All this should have been a done deal back in the '60s,That dispute was settled and I think $2.1 million was given to the tribe to relinquish all rights to what we refer to as Tract D, which takes in Glenwood, and so they accepted the money, ceded all rights to it.
then if it was sold with legal documents then it’s a closed door right ?

Offline millerwheeler

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1512
  • Location: Spanaway
  • Get out and put some miles on those boots
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2024, 05:42:47 PM »
Voices will do nothing it’s probably too far gone. As said we have given and given.  We will see ruling soon as stated

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5615
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2024, 07:58:02 PM »
Old news.  Glenwood and a bunch of 578 is Reservation.  Expect a lot of State land and the Conboy unit to be transferred too.

Some water to Glenwood Ranches have already been shut off.  You need a Res permit to draw water.

https://www.goldendalesentinel.com/news/tract-d-is-yakama-land-u-s-supreme-court-rules/article_427ccbac-c0d3-11ec-8a06-4b1c1d26dea2.html

I own 80 acres 1/2 on res land.   No surprise. 

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6390
  • Location: Toledo
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2024, 05:41:23 AM »
Said Goldendale on my previous post. Meant Glenwood.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2024, 07:17:01 AM by HntnFsh »

Online Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #14 on: November 13, 2024, 07:14:57 AM »
Old news.  Glenwood and a bunch of 578 is Reservation.  Expect a lot of State land and the Conboy unit to be transferred too.

Some water to Glenwood Ranches have already been shut off.  You need a Res permit to draw water.

https://www.goldendalesentinel.com/news/tract-d-is-yakama-land-u-s-supreme-court-rules/article_427ccbac-c0d3-11ec-8a06-4b1c1d26dea2.html

I own 80 acres 1/2 on res land.   No surprise.
grandparents live there I’m hearing it potentially will require a res tag to hunt but if conboy gets sucked in that elk herd will be decimated
 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by elkaholic123
[Today at 07:18:53 PM]


Found tripod by royalbull
[Today at 06:49:42 PM]


My new BB Gun by hollymaster
[Today at 06:48:48 PM]


We lost one of our own (Colockumelk) by bearpaw
[Today at 06:31:48 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by brokentrail
[Today at 06:29:59 PM]


Research Request - Deer, Moose & Elk Samples by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 06:25:59 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by bearpaw
[Today at 06:21:52 PM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by bb76
[Today at 06:10:17 PM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by Tbar
[Today at 06:05:21 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Houmike
[Today at 03:16:47 PM]


re-barreling a gun by pickardjw
[Today at 02:20:48 PM]


Moose Hunt - Mt. Spokane North - Late Season Advice by shafump86
[Today at 12:39:58 PM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by logola512c
[Today at 12:30:45 PM]


Color phase fox by redi
[Today at 11:23:13 AM]


Selling Pistols and rifles by Rat44
[Today at 10:58:30 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by blackveltbowhunter
[Today at 10:58:11 AM]


Cabelas Pro-Series decoys by Hilltop123
[Today at 10:41:50 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Pathfinder101
[Today at 10:35:13 AM]


AKC Australian Shepherd Puppies by TeacherMan
[Today at 10:30:34 AM]


5x5 Elk Antlers by tgomez
[Today at 10:30:34 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal