collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 13008 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 470
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8775
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3049
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9636
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Teanaway bull elk by chukarchaser
[Today at 05:56:53 PM]


Yakima bow shop by maxwell
[Today at 05:41:04 PM]


3 days for Kings by Stein
[Today at 05:41:04 PM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by 6haase6
[Today at 05:25:46 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by Stein
[Today at 05:01:50 PM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by Zardoz
[Today at 04:57:06 PM]


If this is your trap by MADMAX
[Today at 04:40:56 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 03:55:08 PM]


The end? Bird bands. by hdshot
[Today at 03:44:43 PM]


WA Moose scouting by TriggerMike
[Today at 03:15:08 PM]


North Sea Fishing trip by BLH69
[Today at 02:05:14 PM]


2025 Crab! by BLH69
[Today at 02:02:40 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by MMCCAULEY
[Today at 09:25:10 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by riflehunter
[Today at 08:03:26 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 07:31:32 AM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:01:45 AM]


Hunting bears in the thick stuff by J-Bone
[Yesterday at 09:23:26 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal