collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 15911 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 480
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Online hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8879
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3066
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9672
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho on the verge of outlawing by BeerBugler
[Today at 11:38:11 AM]


re-barreling a gun by Smokeploe
[Today at 11:36:39 AM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by Pathfinder101
[Today at 11:27:03 AM]


Selkirk GMU 113 Moose by Ridgeratt
[Today at 11:22:29 AM]


seeking recommendation for women's raingear by Westside88
[Today at 11:16:28 AM]


European mounts around Spokane by washingtonmuley
[Today at 11:12:05 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 10:43:38 AM]


Color phase fox by benhuntin
[Today at 10:31:24 AM]


CWD drop off station- What a joke! by Pathfinder101
[Today at 10:16:16 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by trophyhunt
[Today at 09:39:38 AM]


Dehydrating Chantrelles by ASHQUACK
[Today at 09:10:20 AM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by hunter399
[Today at 09:02:52 AM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Schmalzfam
[Today at 08:52:44 AM]


Rylee’s first Mule deer! by Schmalzfam
[Today at 08:45:09 AM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by finnman
[Today at 08:44:02 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Nate p
[Today at 08:07:27 AM]


Japanese Kei truck? by trophyhunt
[Today at 07:20:27 AM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by Shooter4
[Today at 06:22:29 AM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by ganghis
[Yesterday at 10:43:39 PM]


No tracking dogs in Weyerhaeuser by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 07:29:34 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal