Free: Contests & Raffles.
One thing I see posted a lot about these raffle tags and auction tags is how these big spenders are helping so much with the conservation of whichever species they are buying tags for. I know the money must be going somewhere, but I can’t remember any tag numbers for us normal hunters increasing even one time since these special tags were implemented. The opposite seems to be true where seasons keep getting shorter and “ quality “ permit numbers continue to decline. I think that’s where some of this so called jealousy arises from. 1 guy has numerous big horn sheep and monster bulls while the rest of us are limited to one tag in your life, all because of money? Maybe the OIL rules should apply to these raffle and auction tags also for the true OIL species?
Didn't you pack salt in to a location to attract your deer and have it become habituated to a certain location and the scent of you being there? What's the difference? You probably have more photos of your deer than this guy does of his elk alive.
I don't want to derail record bull thread anymore than it is, so I thought I would pose the question here. I think its readily apparent anytime a big bull is posted the "jealousy" label gets slapped up more times than Fauci saying "stop the spread" during a covid press conference. My question is, is it it really that simple? Is any comment that questions the validity, or is not a glowing affirmation of the hunters prowess and skill driven solely by this single emotion. Personally, I think jealousy by and large has very little to do with it. Obviously jealousy exists I am not denying that. However, hunting when viewed as a "sport" by a group is unique and may be the only sport that has no scale upon which to measure the individuals accomplishments. The individual by the nature of taking a life, should be satisfied with their results. But once shared they open themselves up to criticism upon which there are no written rules ( after the legal ones ) to compare the level of "good". In sports like basketball, football, golf etc..., there are rigidly defined parameters that govern all players in a specific era and level. Determining the level of skill needed to achieve or excel is easy. In other words, you cannot pay enough to get someone to lower the basket so you can win a dunking contest against Jordan. Contest sports ( which i categorize hunting in ) like boxing or UFC get a little more sideways because competition can to some extent be chosen. Still, its pretty transparent and relatively easy to spot when a contender is ducking another or weighing the odds in their favor. By and large I think most hunters that raise questions are not doing so because they are jealous, but because they want a reference for comparisons. Specifically comparisons to their own styles or self imposed rules. Big bulls and bucks area always cool. But being the highest score TO ME has little to do with that animals ability to survive, to grow, or most pertinent to this topic escape and evade hunters. The truth cold and hard as it is, is this. No free range animal living on hay bales in back yards, with limited to no hunting pressure, in the proximity of humans, possibly driven off home field advantage due to snow, is comparable when being hunted to an animal who is not blessed with those gifts. I think some folks believe that because they utilize their money or other resources to get them access to those types of animals who are not as equipped to deal with hunter pressure, they will be categorized differently than others. And they will. That doesn't make those who are judging jealous, it just makes a more equitable comparison. It reminds me of the scene in rocky 3 when Mick tell Rocky that he would get killed in a fight against Clubber, and his title defenses were against handpicked fighters. I don't get why it bothers anyone at all on either side. If it does, do something about it instead of throwing labels.
Quote from: TimberMuleys on January 04, 2025, 11:07:30 PMDidn't you pack salt in to a location to attract your deer and have it become habituated to a certain location and the scent of you being there? What's the difference? You probably have more photos of your deer than this guy does of his elk alive.That’s not even close to the same thing. And if you can’t see the difference then you’re the problem with hunting today. I packed in salt 5 months and 4 days before I shot my buck. And it only came to the salt lick 3 times before the season began and hadn’t been to the salt in 5 weeks before I shot it. I wasn’t trying to get it “habituated” to anything, I was trying to see what was living in an area and be able to target the most mature buck. I shot my buck almost 4 miles from any roads and over 2000 feet of elevation gain from my pickup. The difference is I worked by butt off for a buck that nobody else knew about and was happy with that. I didn’t lie about it and actually shoot it in my neighborhood where it was eating under my apple tree the day before. Casey’s son Beau is acting like it was a grueling hunt for months and this bull “reappeared” in December and they finally got it done on the last day. I don’t know the details of the hunt, nor does it really matter as long as it was legal. But it is not even close to the same, mine was an otc tag that anyone in the world with a hunters license can buy. His bull was on a raffle tag in which you can hunt for 5 months straight and he didn’t get it done until it came down by people’s yards. Am I saying I wouldn’t have shot the bull? Absolutely not, I would’ve shot that bull in a heartbeat. However, if I had shot it, I would’ve came clean and told everyone the truth of the story, which they still haven’t done. Everything about this bull is hear say so far and that is why it is so controversial. If they had came clean and said, we shot this bull the second it crossed onto public from so and so’s yard full of hay, the story would’ve lost its luster, but at least everyone would’ve known the truth. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: 7mmBuckley on January 05, 2025, 01:26:39 PMQuote from: TimberMuleys on January 04, 2025, 11:07:30 PMDidn't you pack salt in to a location to attract your deer and have it become habituated to a certain location and the scent of you being there? What's the difference? You probably have more photos of your deer than this guy does of his elk alive.That’s not even close to the same thing. And if you can’t see the difference then you’re the problem with hunting today. I packed in salt 5 months and 4 days before I shot my buck. And it only came to the salt lick 3 times before the season began and hadn’t been to the salt in 5 weeks before I shot it. I wasn’t trying to get it “habituated” to anything, I was trying to see what was living in an area and be able to target the most mature buck. I shot my buck almost 4 miles from any roads and over 2000 feet of elevation gain from my pickup. The difference is I worked by butt off for a buck that nobody else knew about and was happy with that. I didn’t lie about it and actually shoot it in my neighborhood where it was eating under my apple tree the day before. Casey’s son Beau is acting like it was a grueling hunt for months and this bull “reappeared” in December and they finally got it done on the last day. I don’t know the details of the hunt, nor does it really matter as long as it was legal. But it is not even close to the same, mine was an otc tag that anyone in the world with a hunters license can buy. His bull was on a raffle tag in which you can hunt for 5 months straight and he didn’t get it done until it came down by people’s yards. Am I saying I wouldn’t have shot the bull? Absolutely not, I would’ve shot that bull in a heartbeat. However, if I had shot it, I would’ve came clean and told everyone the truth of the story, which they still haven’t done. Everything about this bull is hear say so far and that is why it is so controversial. If they had came clean and said, we shot this bull the second it crossed onto public from so and so’s yard full of hay, the story would’ve lost its luster, but at least everyone would’ve known the truth. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkYou nailed it!!! The hunters kid has caused a ton of people to chime in. Keep your mouth shut and move on BUT when you attempt to paint a picture as this was a DIY hunt for 4 months when it was shot just off of a apple pile in someone’s pasture is plain and simple IT IS WRONG!! He wanted attention and he got it!!! Your post is spot on!!
You nailed it!!!! Maybe you guys should start a thread about why Beau Brooks is misleading everyone then. Not bash his dad who hasn't made any claims what so ever about the elk.