collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 17147 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8994
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3082
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9693
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Lion Down - the Savor of Success by Alex4200
[Today at 08:09:18 AM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by ASHQUACK
[Today at 07:57:23 AM]


This Jeff Davis guy. by boneaddict
[Today at 07:18:14 AM]


In the background by nwwanderer
[Today at 06:44:34 AM]


Swakane by redi
[Yesterday at 11:27:02 PM]


MOA or MRAD, & Why? by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 09:57:59 PM]


Pics from this year 2025 by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:36:06 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by jstone
[Yesterday at 09:14:54 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:12:33 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 07:38:11 PM]


Trap Check Time by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 07:33:16 PM]


Dodge 48re transmission recommendations by 92xj
[Yesterday at 06:19:32 PM]


Crazy looking Deer by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 06:10:52 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 05:31:47 PM]


Leopard Cur Pups by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 11:05:27 AM]


Smelt ? by Trapper John
[Yesterday at 10:41:03 AM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:26:27 AM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 10:06:23 AM]


Long Range Steel Choke by Elmer Fletch
[Yesterday at 06:10:11 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal