collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 16857 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8963
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3076
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9685
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Montana Elk Last Ditch Effort by pickardjw
[Today at 05:52:08 PM]


Older SxS shotgun by wadu1
[Today at 05:22:45 PM]


The Gutless Method by jstone
[Today at 05:13:33 PM]


Wowzers by trophyhunt
[Today at 05:08:28 PM]


211 Mile Ambler Road Through The Brooks Range Approved by dwils233
[Today at 04:51:34 PM]


Bull moose...luck or ??? by Buckhunter24
[Today at 03:10:51 PM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by EnglishSetter
[Today at 03:08:14 PM]


Meet Kumpel by metlhead
[Today at 02:07:25 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 01:51:59 PM]


My 2025 Wyoming trip by Falcon
[Today at 01:43:14 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by northwesthunter84
[Today at 01:35:33 PM]


Aladdin unit 111 mule deer quality tag by Cylvertip
[Today at 10:58:54 AM]


Drew Pogue Quality by Buckblaster
[Today at 10:29:34 AM]


Break my heart - Archery World is closing by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:07:25 AM]


2024 Ford Edge Opinion/Bought a Chevrolet by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:14:27 AM]


What are you cooking? by Pnwrider
[Yesterday at 10:27:08 PM]


My 2025 Montana Buck by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 10:18:25 PM]


Where to find hunting mentors/etc in western wa (archery) by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 08:14:54 PM]


AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by dblungshot
[Yesterday at 06:38:26 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal