For all you private land owners in WA

[HntnFsh]

Commerce isnt just boats etc. A lot of stuff was floated back in the day. Shake bolts for one. I think that is part of the reason for the confusion.

[LDennis24]

Wait so you don’t even know what this about? You didn’t see the Supreme Court ruling on article xvi of the New Mexico State constitution? Got it. I’ll leave you to continue carry on yelling about stuff you don’t even bother to learn about.

Wait, so you went and looked it up and want to post now to make it sound like you knew what was up all along! 🤡 I saw it, it's another socialist program for hunters and anglers who don't support landowners rights. The ones who think it's ok to intrude on someone's private land they worked hard for because they can't just go somewhere else. It's totally socialist behavior. Prove me wrong. 

[LDennis24]

This goes hand in hand with the UIA and the Wyoming corner crossing case. I said it on that thread and people didn't like it. But don't be surprised when every landowner in the state stops letting people access their land because of stuff like this! 

Stops letting people do what? Float down a river that they have property on? Can’t do that. Just like on the sound. As long as I am floating on the water and not touching the ground I’m not trespassing.

Maybe you should read the article. It's non navigable water only accessible by crossing their land. THEIR LAND! It's called trespassing. Remember, reading comprehension! I didn't post anything about floating the river but that's not possible either.

Have to cross a fence because they put a fence across the stream.

Nope, you have to cross a fence AND their land to even get to the water is what the article says.

[Platensek-po]

Wait so you don’t even know what this about? You didn’t see the Supreme Court ruling on article xvi of the New Mexico State constitution? Got it. I’ll leave you to continue carry on yelling about stuff you don’t even bother to learn about.

Wait, so you went and looked it up and want to post now to make it sound like you knew what was up all along! 🤡 I saw it, it's another socialist program for hunters and anglers who don't support landowners rights. The ones who think it's ok to intrude on someone's private land they worked hard for because they can't just go somewhere else. It's totally socialist behavior. Prove me wrong.

A Supreme Court ruling a socialist program? Lolololol.

[LDennis24]

Focus on the wrong part of my statement, that's your problem. Taking landowners rights away by allowing people to cross their property to get to public land or water is taking someones rights to give rights to another person. What is it called when you take from one person or group to provide for another group? I'll use that term instead. Please teach me!

Wait wait wait... I found it! It's COMMUNISM!

Your right, it's not Socialist

[Platensek-po]

Focus on the wrong part of my statement, that's your problem. Taking landowners rights away by allowing people to cross their property to get to public land or water is taking someones rights to give rights to another person. What is it called when you take from one person or group to provide for another group? I'll use that term instead. Please teach me!

Wait wait wait... I found it! It's COMMUNISM!

Your right, it's not Socialist

Pretty sure I already explained that you need to go back to grade school if you need to be taught these things. From the looks of it you seem to really hate America and its system of government. You call a Supreme Court ruling on a state constitution communism and socialism! ***text censored***  Good luck with that! You really seem to be winning people with your fallacious arguments and false equivalencies.



This is a reminder that name calling is not allowed on the forum, please keep comments civil!

[LDennis24]

Focus on the wrong part of my statement, that's your problem. Taking landowners rights away by allowing people to cross their property to get to public land or water is taking someones rights to give rights to another person. What is it called when you take from one person or group to provide for another group? I'll use that term instead. Please teach me!

Wait wait wait... I found it! It's COMMUNISM!

Your right, it's not Socialist

Pretty sure I already explained that you need to go back to grade school if you need to be taught these things. From the looks of it you seem to really hate America and its system of government. You call a Supreme Court ruling on a state constitution communism and socialism! ***text censored*** Good luck with that! You really seem to be winning people with your fallacious arguments and false equivalencies.

Right! You sure know me! Your opinion of me doesn't matter. Your spewing garbage about the New Mexico Supreme Court somehow being right about everything yet if they ruled tomorrow that guns and hunting are not allowed then you will suddenly be against their rulings right! Your arguments a joke. That's how the left operates. ***text censored***


This is a reminder that name calling is not allowed on the forum, please keep comments civil!

[MADMAX]

.

[LDennis24]

  I can flip crap just as good as anyone else. Moving on...

[walt]

I can flip crap just as good as anyone else. Moving on...

Keep up the fight LDennis24.  This should be a great concern to anyone who owns property and values property rights.  I’m all for access to public land but it should be done through a legal easement, not tromping through and over private property.  I’d like to think our legislators could write and pass a bill allowing eminent domain or whatever to create public easements to isolated public lands at the most reasonable access point and the current landowner paid market value for their loss.

[LDennis24]

I can flip crap just as good as anyone else. Moving on...

Keep up the fight LDennis24.  This should be a great concern to anyone who owns property and values property rights.  I’m all for access to public land but it should be done through a legal easement, not tromping through and over private property.  I’d like to think our legislators could write and pass a bill allowing eminent domain or whatever to create public easements to isolated public lands at the most reasonable access point and the current landowner paid market value for their loss.

I don't disagree with access to public land at all. I have asked and been denied access to walk 20 yds across a guys property and been told no. Life goes on. I don't think pushing it in court and getting people's rights taken away is the way to go about it though. I don't know that I agree with eminent domain either. I would not be happy if the state came and took half of my land even if they paid me 1.5 times market value. I use the land. A land swap would be acceptable if it was equal acreage but not monetary value to me in most situations. I would need to move somewhere else to have the same amount of land and resources I once had. Cheering for laws to take away from landowners rights is lazy and dangerous.

[walt]

Cheering for laws to take away from landowners rights is lazy and dangerous.

lol.  You have no idea what I believe and advocate for.  Land owner rights are right near the top

[Dan-o]

Name calling is against forum rules. 
Stop now. 
I don't have time to clean this up right now.

If you're unaware of the forum rules, please refresh yourself with them as you agreed to abide by them when you signed up.

They are listed under quick links near the top right of the forum home page. 

P.S.   This is not directed at Walt.   He was simply the last person to post, but I don't see him calling names or throwing insults.

[LDennis24]

Cheering for laws to take away from landowners rights is lazy and dangerous.

lol.  You have no idea what I believe and advocate for.  Land owner rights are right near the top

I was referring to other people's posts if that was confusing

[Fidelk]

Game animals belong to all of the people of the state in which the animals live. No fatcat property owner owns the animals that trespass on his land, it's we the people. Therefore, any hunter (with a valid state license) should be able to pursue any game animal wherever the critter is located.