collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal  (Read 1711 times)

Offline avidnwoutdoorsman

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2019
  • Posts: 419
  • Location: Northwest
  • Groups: NWTF, PF, TU, DU, BCWF, NRA, BHA, RMEF, VWL
Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« on: October 15, 2025, 03:00:47 PM »
I thought it was already a near act of God to get approval anymore to lethally remove a wolf so I figured it had to be pretty real to need to take one. Yet WWF has found a way to prevent our WDFW from doing its job....

https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/at-risk/species-recovery/gray-wolf/updates/court-approves-request-temporary-restraining-order-prevent-sherman-wolf-removal

Court approves request for temporary restraining order to prevent Sherman wolf removal
Publish date
Oct. 14, 2025
Today, Oct. 14, 2025, a King County Superior Court commissioner entered a temporary restraining order that prohibits the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) from lethally removing one wolf from the Sherman pack in Ferry County.

As a result, the Department cannot remove a wolf from the Sherman pack as authorized by WDFW Deputy Director Amy Windrope on Oct. 9, 2025. Information about the authorization appears in a separate update.

Washington Wildlife First and other parties filed the initial petition for injunction and motion for a temporary restraining order after the Department announced the Deputy Director’s authorization.

King County Superior Court commissioner Mark Hillman found that the petitioners had met the criteria for temporary injunctive relief. The court will hold a preliminary injunction hearing on Oct. 28, 2025.

WDFW’s 2011 Wolf Conservation and Management Plan (PDF) and wolf-livestock interaction protocol  (PDF)provide guidance on addressing wolf-livestock conflict, including lethal removal to address patterns of depredation, such as when department staff confirms three predations by wolves on livestock within 30 days or four within 10 months, where non-lethal deterrents have not prevented wolf-livestock conflict.
Keep Calm Gobble On

Offline bearhunter99

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3205
  • Location: Monitor
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2025, 05:00:30 PM »
 :bash: :bash: :bash:

Until we get the courts and "feelings" out of wildlife management we are screwed.  All of these decisions should be made by the wildlife biologists PERIOD.  Same with hound hunting, trapping, etc.....
RIP Colockumelk   :salute:

"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." – Winston Churchill



Genesis 27:3
Now therefore take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the field, and take me some venison

Offline greenhead_killer

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 2234
  • Location: the burg
  • Groups: wsf life member, wsta, mdf, sci, sscf
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2025, 06:32:24 PM »
Why is a king county judge ruling on what goes on in ferry county? Maybe try and stay in your lane.

Offline time2hunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 2815
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2025, 09:37:16 PM »
Sounds like a local issue that should be dealt with appropriately.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Local 3482

Offline Roslyn Rambler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2024
  • Posts: 72
  • Location: Central Wa
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2025, 10:12:29 PM »
All this does is, increases the chances of a illegal killing.

A big middle finger to the conservation groups.

Offline HUNTIN4SIX

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 2815
  • Location: NE Washington
  • My wife loves me.
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #5 on: October 19, 2025, 08:39:26 AM »
Agree with the last two posts.  After one of my cows got attacked by a wolf and 200+ elk ran through all my fences in the last year, I will never call WDFW again.  Any problem with just get handled accordingly.  Their chit show is costing us thousands.....

Online brokentrail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 570
  • Location: Graham, WA
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2025, 11:06:32 AM »
I, myself, would like to see The Sportsmans Alliance, or any other group, in turn, go get the restraining order over-ruled and allow WDFW proceed.  One judge providing a restraining order and one judge saying the restraining order is out of bounds should cancel each other out and allow WDFW to do their job, and also do what was approved within the Wolf Management Plan.

I hope that this King County judge faces disciplinary action for this restraining order, once it is deemed inappropriate, and loses his job.  Judges are supposed to interpret and apply existing laws, the killing of a wolf per an approved management plan doesn't break, or even bend, any existing law.

I also wish WDFW had their own lawyers to do the above, every time some group decides to sue WDFW and keep them from doing their job.

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4806
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2025, 12:54:57 PM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9152
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2025, 01:10:22 PM »
I, myself, would like to see The Sportsmans Alliance, or any other group, in turn, go get the restraining order over-ruled and allow WDFW proceed.  One judge providing a restraining order and one judge saying the restraining order is out of bounds should cancel each other out and allow WDFW to do their job, and also do what was approved within the Wolf Management Plan.

I hope that this King County judge faces disciplinary action for this restraining order, once it is deemed inappropriate, and loses his job.  Judges are supposed to interpret and apply existing laws, the killing of a wolf per an approved management plan doesn't break, or even bend, any existing law.

I also wish WDFW had their own lawyers to do the above, every time some group decides to sue WDFW and keep them from doing their job.
It's a temporary restraining order meaning everything is frozen until they can have a full hearing on the 28th. I doubt any judge would intervene.
Bruce Vandervort

Online brokentrail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 570
  • Location: Graham, WA
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2025, 03:53:34 PM »
I, myself, would like to see The Sportsmans Alliance, or any other group, in turn, go get the restraining order over-ruled and allow WDFW proceed.  One judge providing a restraining order and one judge saying the restraining order is out of bounds should cancel each other out and allow WDFW to do their job, and also do what was approved within the Wolf Management Plan.

I hope that this King County judge faces disciplinary action for this restraining order, once it is deemed inappropriate, and loses his job.  Judges are supposed to interpret and apply existing laws, the killing of a wolf per an approved management plan doesn't break, or even bend, any existing law.

I also wish WDFW had their own lawyers to do the above, every time some group decides to sue WDFW and keep them from doing their job.
It's a temporary restraining order meaning everything is frozen until they can have a full hearing on the 28th. I doubt any judge would intervene.

Yea,  I don't doubt that at all,  I just wish that wasn't the case.

Offline Houndhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 3026
  • Location: Continental Divide
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2025, 04:00:31 PM »
Judges holding up all kinds of things these days...

Offline highcountry_hunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 726
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2025, 09:41:26 PM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

The largest cattle producer in NE WA, who has suffered more cattle loss than any other producer in the state, refuses to accept a dollar from wdfw for depredations

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19158
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2025, 09:44:03 PM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

The largest cattle producer in NE WA, who has suffered more cattle loss than any other producer in the state, refuses to accept a dollar from wdfw for depredations

Who would that be?
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18404
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #13 on: October 20, 2025, 09:48:27 PM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

The largest cattle producer in NE WA, who has suffered more cattle loss than any other producer in the state, refuses to accept a dollar from wdfw for depredations

Do you know why he won't accept any of their money?
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38831
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #14 on: Yesterday at 08:32:14 AM »
Wolves in WA is exactly how many of us said it would be from the beginning! No surprise!

Livestock reimbursement is a fallacy used by wolf groups and wolf loving F&G agencies to coerce the public into accepting wolves, most livestock producers are suffering losses without getting compensation as promised. The producer that has refused compensation is very principled, that's why he won't take their wolf money.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by knh
[Today at 08:03:39 AM]


Rotator Cuff repair X 2 advice needed by trophyhunt
[Today at 07:51:25 AM]


Pack wheel by Tbar
[Today at 07:19:29 AM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by HUNTIN4SIX
[Today at 07:06:32 AM]


Sturgeon Set-ups by gallion_t
[Today at 07:01:01 AM]


Any of our photographers on here have pics of the comet? by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:58:49 AM]


E WA waterfowl guide by Tbar
[Today at 06:07:04 AM]


Share your out of state experience by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 10:23:07 PM]


Weatherby Mark V Feeding Issue - Amateur Gunsmith Advice Needed by Reidus
[Yesterday at 09:59:59 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:35:55 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by redi
[Yesterday at 08:34:06 PM]


Poll: Supreme Court will decide if 'habitual drug users' lose their gun rights by Tinmaniac
[Yesterday at 07:30:40 PM]


2025 Mt. St. Helens success? by p-ohana
[Yesterday at 05:43:28 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by brew
[Yesterday at 05:02:07 PM]


Weatherby Vanguard vs. Browning x bolt by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 04:41:26 PM]


Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 02:55:17 PM]


No upland with dog during deer and elk season? by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 01:56:48 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 12:50:07 PM]


Disappearing ink. by bustedoldman
[Yesterday at 11:15:08 AM]


Possible record bull? by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 10:48:01 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal