collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal  (Read 2081 times)

Offline highcountry_hunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 728
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #15 on: October 21, 2025, 02:20:22 PM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

The largest cattle producer in NE WA, who has suffered more cattle loss than any other producer in the state, refuses to accept a dollar from wdfw for depredations

Do you know why he won't accept any of their money?

I think it’s a matter of pride, he told me that one day and I never dug too deep on it. 

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4806
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #16 on: October 21, 2025, 04:44:34 PM »
Money offered for direct kills is a very small % of the losses and comes with strings with the WDFW, a very discouraging process.  Lights, flags, range riders and more

Offline Smokeploe

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 266
  • Location: Ethel
  • Groups: FTE, shooterforum
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #17 on: October 21, 2025, 05:15:58 PM »
How can a state judge block anything to do with wolves, I thought and read that the wolf problem is a federal thing?

Smokeploe
Smokeploe

When guns are outlawed then only outlaws will have guns!
The same with ammo!
The same with personal liberties

Offline avidnwoutdoorsman

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2019
  • Posts: 421
  • Location: Northwest
  • Groups: NWTF, PF, TU, DU, BCWF, NRA, BHA, RMEF, VWL
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #18 on: October 21, 2025, 06:45:14 PM »
How can a state judge block anything to do with wolves, I thought and read that the wolf problem is a federal thing?

Smokeploe
They are delisted federally in eastern WA. It’s entirely a state issue that there are no seasons and no bag limits and no management.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Keep Calm Gobble On

Offline time2hunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 2818
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #19 on: October 21, 2025, 07:04:46 PM »
How can a state judge block anything to do with wolves, I thought and read that the wolf problem is a federal thing?

Smokeploe
They are delisted federally in eastern WA. It’s entirely a state issue that there are no seasons and no bag limits and no management.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sounds like a good time


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Local 3482

Offline avidnwoutdoorsman

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2019
  • Posts: 421
  • Location: Northwest
  • Groups: NWTF, PF, TU, DU, BCWF, NRA, BHA, RMEF, VWL
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #20 on: October 21, 2025, 07:07:13 PM »
How can a state judge block anything to do with wolves, I thought and read that the wolf problem is a federal thing?

Smokeploe
They are delisted federally in eastern WA. It’s entirely a state issue that there are no seasons and no bag limits and no management.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sounds like a good time


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lol you know what I meant. It’s why they aren’t a game animal and have seasons or bag limits like they should equivalent to ID. The feds turned them over to the state and the state gets to decide how the resource is managed or in this case mis-managed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Keep Calm Gobble On

Offline dc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 272
  • Location: kelso wash.
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #21 on: October 21, 2025, 07:14:10 PM »
Well after just returning from a deer hunt in 101, i see the need to remove a wolf or 2.  The area I tend to hunt in the 101 has in the past 7 yrs had many deer seen every day, with sign galore.  This yr although deer were seen, it was a small number compared to yrs past.  Opening day, I ran into a wolf track in the soft dirt.  The next morning roughly 1 mile from the track I heard several wolfs howling across from me on the next ridge.  This was all fairly close to Sherman pass. 

Offline HUNTIN4SIX

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 2816
  • Location: NE Washington
  • My wife loves me.
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 07:06:32 AM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

The largest cattle producer in NE WA, who has suffered more cattle loss than any other producer in the state, refuses to accept a dollar from wdfw for depredations

Do you know why he won't accept any of their money?

I think it’s a matter of pride, he told me that one day and I never dug too deep on it.

He probably understands that taking money from government in this case could essentially be contracting.   WDFW doesn't just show up with a check.  Its one big game, I wouldn't except money either.  I was told I could get a elk depredation tag after 200+ elk ran through all my fences, and I said no.  Giving out depredation money and tags does nothing but give folks a warm fuzzy.  WDFW just plain needs to manage OUR wildlife better. It is an absolute chit show and seldom will they determine its a wolf kill anyway.  I was told a wolf attacked my cow, but it would still be undetermined since they didn't dee the wolf.
I cant even gather my thoughts on this subject, it pisses me off so bad....

Offline highcountry_hunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 728
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #23 on: Yesterday at 01:11:12 PM »
Sounds about right…

Getting reimbursed for depredations is small potatoes compared to mother cows that should have 90% pregnancy rates, yet are closer to 60% now due to stress. Or the fact that cattle aren’t gaining weight on summer range because they’re constantly running for their lives instead of grazing.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

It was a great year by MADMAX
[Today at 02:05:39 PM]


Called about Returned Alta Buck Permit by knighttime25
[Today at 01:55:21 PM]


Bullet performance 2025? by jrebel
[Today at 01:48:09 PM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by pianoman9701
[Today at 01:47:07 PM]


BBQ Flats camping during modern? by jrebel
[Today at 12:14:05 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Pathfinder101
[Today at 10:57:35 AM]


Big bear on trail cam Kitsap County by Sundance
[Today at 10:40:22 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by jowings22
[Today at 10:15:35 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by C-Money
[Today at 09:13:37 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by ballpark
[Today at 09:04:37 AM]


Recommendations for Pressure Washers by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 08:56:49 AM]


Mill creek watershed by 3cityhuntr
[Today at 08:38:16 AM]


Stop Moving Dead Deer Outside of 100 Series GMUs by HUNTIN4SIX
[Today at 08:00:20 AM]


Bear That Hasn’t Missed Many Meals by Alchase
[Today at 06:38:03 AM]


Youth Cow Elk - Yakima South GMUs 364, 368 by Limhangerslayer
[Yesterday at 10:58:51 PM]


Taneum Elk Cow tag problem by Hiker82
[Yesterday at 09:28:54 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by X-Force
[Yesterday at 08:22:35 PM]


Coupeville Highway pop-up blind by BigredRusch
[Yesterday at 08:19:51 PM]


GMU 336 by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 08:18:06 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal