collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Is it a conflict of interest  (Read 1751 times)

Offline Barehunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2021
  • Posts: 62
  • Location: Battleground
    • Mark Burk
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #15 on: Yesterday at 05:20:43 PM »
I guess my real issue is they are spending alot of time patrolling private land when there is alot of need for them all over there area.I was checked by 3 different wardens and got 8 pictures on cams of them on days I did not get checked. I did get checked at the gate on sunday
By 2 wardens that was maybe an overtime shift but I dont know.
Maybe i is just me but that is spending alot of time in one small area. I guess I might be off base but I sure thank you guys for your imput.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10667
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 06:10:03 PM »
It really rubs me the wrong way that game wardens are working for private companies when a couple miles away on state land
people are dumping garbage at a great place to shot. private companies should hire there own security. instead of using goverment
employees as security guards.
If they are patrolling the area as part of a patrol contract with the landowner then they aren't using govt funds for the patrol. The company has to pick-up the entire cost of the patrol (salary, fuel, etc.)

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Offline Barehunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2021
  • Posts: 62
  • Location: Battleground
    • Mark Burk
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #17 on: Yesterday at 06:26:11 PM »
It really rubs me the wrong way that game wardens are working for private companies when a couple miles away on state land
people are dumping garbage at a great place to shot. private companies should hire there own security. instead of using goverment
employees as security guards.
If they are patrolling the area as part of a patrol contract with the landowner then they aren't using govt funds for the patrol. The company has to pick-up the entire cost of the patrol (salary, fuel, etc.)

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
That does make me feel better that the tax payers are not pay to protect timber companies interest over public land and resources. I do have to admit that seeing game wardens on my cameras and being check often made me alittle butthurt. So thanks guys for setting me straight.

Offline EnglishSetter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2024
  • Posts: 540
  • Location: Winlock
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #18 on: Yesterday at 06:30:47 PM »
It really rubs me the wrong way that game wardens are working for private companies when a couple miles away on state land
people are dumping garbage at a great place to shot. private companies should hire there own security. instead of using goverment
employees as security guards.
If they are patrolling the area as part of a patrol contract with the landowner then they aren't using govt funds for the patrol. The company has to pick-up the entire cost of the patrol (salary, fuel, etc.)

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Does make me wonder if private is also funding their pensions though.

Offline builtfordtough

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 606
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #19 on: Yesterday at 06:31:23 PM »
Maybe there is a reason why the game wardens are there so often.   Investigating illegal activity, a game wardens presence isnt a bad thing

Offline Barehunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2021
  • Posts: 62
  • Location: Battleground
    • Mark Burk
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #20 on: Yesterday at 06:42:37 PM »
Maybe there is a reason why the game wardens are there so often.   Investigating illegal activity, a game wardens presence isnt a bad thing
I agree that the area should have patrols because the game animals do belong to the people. I was driving in the private property
and was stopped by game warden and we had this very discussion. I was not hunting so they wanted to check that i was not trespassing of
course I had proper paperwork. But doing timber company business just pissed me off.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8988
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #21 on: Today at 08:09:56 AM »
Law enforcement does side jobs all the time.
Walmart hires them to stand around.
Banks sometimes hire them during holiday times ect.

No surprise timber company would hire them
Not that I totally agree,but it is common.
Gotta use that pay to play money,to protect there gates and resources.
So if you think about it ,you paid for him to be there.
« Last Edit: Today at 08:17:25 AM by hunter399 »

Online Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18469
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #22 on: Today at 08:15:04 AM »
Law enforcement does side jobs all the time.
Walmart hires them to stand around.
Banks sometimes hire them during holiday times ect.

No surprise timber company would hire them

This is how I see it.
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45487
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #23 on: Today at 09:55:19 AM »
It seems like a good investment. We, the state, get paid to patrol concentrated areas of hunters, like timber property. More contact with hunters means more enforcement of the rules protecting our resource. The resource doesn't know where the boundaries are. This affects wildlife populations on private lands, as well.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline Bullkllr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4956
  • Location: Graham
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #24 on: Today at 10:59:00 AM »
It seems like there may be two issues of concern here.

1. Game wardens getting contracted and paid by private landowners. Personally I support this. Especially regarding the amount of private timberland in WW.

2. GWs spread too thin already concerning the state land issues. Yes it's a concern, but I'm not sure how much time GWs can devote to dumping on state land, etc. Seems like that might get referred to DNR anyway.
Charlie Kirk didn't speak hate, they hated what he said. Don't get it twisted.

Offline salmosalar

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2019
  • Posts: 561
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #25 on: Today at 11:06:45 AM »
It's similar to a venue paying te police at events, I suppose. I think that there is something of a difference in that the police gnerally aren't checking ticket stubbs on behalf of the venue.

I had heard that the WDFW presence on WEYCO land was really high and visable this past fall. WDFW has a smallish budget, they may prefer to do enforcement paid for by WEYCO for budget reasons. I don't know any WDFW officers in that area so I don't have anyone to ask.

I heard that a bull was shot on ground that I have exclusive legal access to. I have seen people trsspassing on it, but did not confront since they may be armed with a firearm and there were 2 of them and 1 of me. I figured that it's no use being right if you are also dead.

I wonder if I saw people on that small timber co. ground and reported them, whether the officer would show up? Maybe I will make a call.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3078
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Is it a conflict of interest
« Reply #26 on: Today at 11:34:01 AM »
It's similar to a venue paying te police at events, I suppose. I think that there is something of a difference in that the police gnerally aren't checking ticket stubbs on behalf of the venue.

I had heard that the WDFW presence on WEYCO land was really high and visable this past fall. WDFW has a smallish budget, they may prefer to do enforcement paid for by WEYCO for budget reasons. I don't know any WDFW officers in that area so I don't have anyone to ask.

I heard that a bull was shot on ground that I have exclusive legal access to. I have seen people trsspassing on it, but did not confront since they may be armed with a firearm and there were 2 of them and 1 of me. I figured that it's no use being right if you are also dead.

I wonder if I saw people on that small timber co. ground and reported them, whether the officer would show up? Maybe I will make a call.
Call them,  they will respond. 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Stickers by Brute
[Today at 11:56:27 AM]


Tease 'l' by Pathfinder101
[Today at 11:50:31 AM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by D-Rock425
[Today at 11:42:28 AM]


Is it a conflict of interest by Tbar
[Today at 11:34:01 AM]


30-40 Yard Shots at Coyotes using the NocPix Rico 2 S75R 1280 by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:15:25 AM]


This year, last year by ballpark
[Today at 10:39:21 AM]


more mass?, not sure I care by OutHouse
[Today at 10:25:41 AM]


The Lookback by OutHouse
[Today at 10:24:23 AM]


Late Achery Hunt 💥VIDEO💥 by jstone
[Today at 09:50:43 AM]


Degreasing A Deer Skull by hunter399
[Today at 08:01:17 AM]


Moose in western washington? by kball4
[Today at 06:19:20 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Wanttohuntmore
[Yesterday at 10:14:01 PM]


Seekins PH3 by Hitsman3
[Yesterday at 08:21:48 PM]


Mule Deer Management Zones by Swervingtrouts
[Yesterday at 07:53:26 PM]


Smelt ? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 06:27:35 PM]


Dodge 48re transmission recommendations by Fastass350
[Yesterday at 06:23:00 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by luvmystang67
[Yesterday at 05:30:13 PM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by muleyguy
[Yesterday at 05:28:37 PM]


Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by Broomd
[Yesterday at 05:24:20 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 03:59:08 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal