collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Looking for BroadHead  (Read 37412 times)

Offline vanhornhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 220
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #60 on: August 04, 2009, 10:49:24 PM »
Im not convinced either I think there's quite a few fixed blade broadheads that fall in that category.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #61 on: August 05, 2009, 11:45:25 AM »
The T-Locks are not legal in Washington State

It is unlawful to hunt big game animals with a broadhead blade unless the broadhead is unbarbed and completely closed at
the back end of the blade or blades by a smooth, unbroken surface starting at maximum blade width forming a smooth
line toward the feather end of the shaft and such line does not angle toward the point.

They're not barbed if that's what your thinking? And they're not sharp on the back edge either. :dunno:


Okay now what the hell. Unless I fell off the boat, and unless u r referencing something other than a shuttle t lock, every damn Broadhead on the shelve has close to a 90 degree back. Muzzy, montec, slick trick. If they are not, then they are damn close. So, help explain what's up. By the way, I f****** hate the rules in this state. Soon the actual bend in a hook will be considered a barb, and we will be left to use the ancient " toggle hook". 

The key is they don't form a smooth line toward the feather end of the shaft. The fact that they form a 90 degree back to the shaft is what makes them illegal. That 90 is what constitutes a barb.

looks like i might have some filing to do on the back of my shuttle t's  :IBCOOL: cuz thats what im usin!!!

Offline Intruder

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1722
  • Location: Spo-Vegas
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #62 on: August 05, 2009, 12:18:37 PM »
I've never heard any legal rulings or interpretations regarding Shuttle-Ts being considered a "barbed" broadhead.  In looking through a catalog I can see several others that appear to have the same 90 deg design: G5 striker, Slick Tricks, Wac Em Triton.  While that certainly doesn't prove that T-Locks are legal... you don't hear mention of these being illegal either.   

I'd be real interested to hear the definitive poop on this.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #63 on: August 11, 2009, 04:28:06 PM »
I've never heard any legal rulings or interpretations regarding Shuttle-Ts being considered a "barbed" broadhead.  In looking through a catalog I can see several others that appear to have the same 90 deg design: G5 striker, Slick Tricks, Wac Em Triton.  While that certainly doesn't prove that T-Locks are legal... you don't hear mention of these being illegal either.   

I'd be real interested to hear the definitive poop on this.
i emailed the wdfw a pic of teh shutle t and got an email response that they are illegal, so would that make strikers and wac'ems, and slick tricks? i dont know. but i will be using a file on the back of my shuttle t lock blades until they make a nice 91 degree angle with the shaft. ridiculus  :bash:
stupid rule.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #64 on: August 11, 2009, 04:32:38 PM »
I agree J bar.. if that interpretation is correct 50% of the heads sold in this state are illegal.
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #65 on: August 11, 2009, 04:33:58 PM »
Thank you for your recent e-mail to WDFW.  Your e-mail has been forwarded to me for a response.

 

The broadhead in the picture below is not lawful for hunting if the rear of the blade is perpendicular to the shaft.   From the picture you provided the angle appears to be 90-degrees. 

 

As you already know, the current archery equipment restrictions require the back of the blade to form a smooth, unbroken surface toward the feather end of the shaft.  Since a 90-degree line cannot also angle toward the feather end of the shaft, this blade is not lawful for hunting in our state.

 

Mik Mikitik

Department of Fish and Wildlife

Enforcement Program

Hunter Education Division

 

 

 

 

From:
Sent: Wed 8/5/2009 11:21 AM
To: Enforcement Office (DFW)
Cc:
Subject: legal broadhead for WA state?


i am emailing to check legality of a broadhead for bowhunting big game in WA state, the head in question is a Trophy Taker Shuttle T-lock, pic provided.

the rule in question is the back of the blade must be smooth unbroken line toward the feather end of the shaft, and not toward the  point. this head has a 90 degree angle from the arrow shaft to the back of the blade. it does not angle either way. can you give me a difinitive answer as to if these are legal or not?

thank you,

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #66 on: August 11, 2009, 04:36:09 PM »
  Slick tricks are ILLEGAL :lol4:  
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline JBar

  • The Family "Guide"
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2148
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #67 on: August 11, 2009, 04:39:12 PM »
That's actually kinda funny because I talked to a pretty reliable person in the archery industry that had talked to the original manufacturer of the T-loc and they sent one to the WDFW and got their approval!  :dunno: I'm stubborn so I'll still use em.
Shut up and Hunt!

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50512
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #68 on: August 11, 2009, 04:40:47 PM »
You fricken criminals.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #69 on: August 11, 2009, 04:42:18 PM »
Hey im legal.... 8)
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #70 on: August 11, 2009, 04:42:50 PM »
That's actually kinda funny because I talked to a pretty reliable person in the archery industry that had talked to the original manufacturer of the T-loc and they sent one to the WDFW and got their approval!  :dunno: I'm stubborn so I'll still use em.
me too!! it will only take a minute to make them legal!!!

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50512
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #71 on: August 11, 2009, 04:43:31 PM »
anybody have a pic of a slicktrick.  I hear about 50% of this forum uses them :chuckle:

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #72 on: August 11, 2009, 04:44:27 PM »
Think of all the points im going to get for turning everone in :IBCOOL:
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50512
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #73 on: August 11, 2009, 04:45:30 PM »
You're on your way to a sheep tag.  Oh wait, even with 100 its still nearly impossible

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: Looking for BroadHead
« Reply #74 on: August 11, 2009, 04:45:53 PM »
here

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Feathernfurr
[Today at 09:37:31 AM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by pianoman9701
[Today at 09:35:02 AM]


European mounts around Spokane by washingtonmuley
[Today at 09:28:12 AM]


Dehydrating Chantrelles by ASHQUACK
[Today at 09:10:20 AM]


2025 Deer season by hunter399
[Today at 09:02:52 AM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Schmalzfam
[Today at 08:52:44 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Cylvertip
[Today at 08:50:47 AM]


Rylee’s first Mule deer! by Schmalzfam
[Today at 08:45:09 AM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by finnman
[Today at 08:44:02 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Nate p
[Today at 08:07:27 AM]


Japanese Kei truck? by trophyhunt
[Today at 07:20:27 AM]


re-barreling a gun by outdooraddict
[Today at 07:16:23 AM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by Shooter4
[Today at 06:22:29 AM]


Color phase fox by JakeLand
[Today at 04:25:22 AM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by ganghis
[Yesterday at 10:43:39 PM]


CWD drop off station- What a joke! by ganghis
[Yesterday at 07:50:49 PM]


No tracking dogs in Weyerhaeuser by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 07:29:34 PM]


MANDATORY REPORTING AND SUBMISSION FOR 100 GMU's!!! by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 07:22:37 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 07:18:41 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by Falcon
[Yesterday at 07:05:32 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal