collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?  (Read 5999 times)

Tony 270WSM

  • Guest
Now my Bushnell Yardage Pro Legend is rated to 930 yards on highly reflective targets, but I've yet to get past 620 no matter what the target. In the manual it does say the range can be reduced on bright days and is best on dark or overcast days.

 

Have hit trees to around 400 or just a bit farther, but am still disappointed it hasn't even sniffed its claimed potential.

 

What is your RF rated to and what have you actually gotten out of it?
« Last Edit: July 21, 2009, 10:52:38 AM by Tony 270WSM »

Offline bucklucky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 9541
  • Location: Skookumchuck Wa.
    • Charlie Smith
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2009, 09:47:30 PM »
Ive gotten 1346 out of my Leica 1200.

Offline jjhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 2262
  • Location: Mule Deer Country
  • Aim small. Miss small.
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2009, 09:53:10 PM »
Over 1900 with Swarovski

Offline ghgetter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 127
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2009, 09:54:06 PM »
1150 with my Leica 900...over 1100 all the time.

Offline Jason

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3562
  • Location: Kalama
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2009, 10:13:42 PM »
getting about 900 yards with my Nikon Monarch 800 but I have hit 950 yards a few times, Tony I had the Bushnell yardage pro Scout 1000 w/arc and had a hard time getting it over 750 yards, the Bushnell's are really slow also, I took it back and got the Nikon.

Offline littlebuf

  • official YAR pack mule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 2773
  • Location: orting
  • TeamYARwetspot-leavin other teams in da wetspot
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2009, 10:24:59 PM »
anything over 400 i dont care about because i know i can get closer. i can tell 900 yards with out a range finder because its to damn far
No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.

Offline JoshT

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 738
  • Location: Sweeping the leg!
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2009, 11:17:43 PM »
anything over 400 i dont care about because i know i can get closer.

Maybe... but will the critter still be there when you get there? You may not have a shot at 50 yards when you do get there... or you may have to take a shot on a moving animal that's aware of your presence... but a broadside shot at 500 on a completely relaxed animal should be avoided? Come on man... 

My Leica 1200 will do about 1k offhand... if I have a solid rest for it (like a tripod) I've seen it go close to 1400.
Strike Hard...
Strike Fast...
No Mercy, SIR!

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2009, 06:29:20 AM »
Only 1150 out of my Leupold that is supposed to go to 1200.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50320
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2009, 09:01:50 AM »
anything over 400 i dont care about because i know i can get closer.

Maybe... but will the critter still be there when you get there? You may not have a shot at 50 yards when you do get there... or you may have to take a shot on a moving animal that's aware of your presence... but a broadside shot at 500 on a completely relaxed animal should be avoided? Come on man... 

My Leica 1200 will do about 1k offhand... if I have a solid rest for it (like a tripod) I've seen it go close to 1400.

this is not a long range debate. we've had plenty of them.
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12147
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2009, 09:30:22 AM »
i have a yardage pro 800, which does anything i ask it to, i have gotten ranges out past 900 with, but you have to awful steady for that
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2009, 09:32:20 AM »
over 1000 out of my leica 900

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2009, 10:24:38 AM »
i got 400 out of my nikon buckamsters 600. little farther than my bow will shoot. i got it for archery and like that it is real small.

Offline Intruder

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1722
  • Location: Spo-Vegas
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #12 on: July 21, 2009, 11:59:49 AM »
1300 and change from my Geovids.

Offline buckhorn2

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 3511
  • Location: grayland wa.
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #13 on: July 21, 2009, 12:52:46 PM »
I just got mail from leopold they just came out a new 600 yard rangefinder for under 200 and a new 750 yard one for under 300. They say it is very accurate.Sounds like a decent price for something you know will work and has good reputation.

Offline Jamieb

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 1862
  • Location: Lacey,WA
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #14 on: July 21, 2009, 01:17:43 PM »
My Leica 1200 lrf will consistently get 1150 to 1200 yards and when the light isn't real bright I'll get to 1400 yards.

Offline PacificNWhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 3601
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2009, 10:17:17 PM »
I just got a nikon 800 and have only gotten 760 out of it. Seem's to range very consitant to 550 ish. Need to get to a range though because it doesnt seem that accurate. Seems to range things too far.....maybe my depth perception is way off.

Tony 270WSM

  • Guest
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #16 on: July 25, 2009, 08:46:24 AM »
Nevermind, keeping the Legend. Took it out to some clear cuts to test it out and it did well, even in the sun and facing the sun. Was hitting tree stumps to 660, though at that range it took a few tries to get it. Don't know why it works better in the sticks than in town, but I won't complain.

Offline ivarhusa

  • Ivar Husa
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 487
  • Location: Richland, WA
  • Believing is easier than thinking.
    • Ivar's Family Web Pages
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #17 on: July 25, 2009, 01:04:49 PM »
My Leica 900 seems to have no problem responding with a reading out to 800+ yards with pretty drab backgrounds (the truest test) such as grass and sage (my country).  I am very pleased.
Live all you can: It’s a mistake not to.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38530
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #18 on: July 25, 2009, 01:14:53 PM »
I have used several different rangefinders and it seems occasioanlly they go the distance, but you can only count on getting about 2/3 the advertised range out of them in the worst conditions. I love them, but find it's best to buy the longest rated you can afford.

If it's foggy or precipitating you might as well keep them put away. :twocents:

I carry a Leica 1200 and can count on getting 800 out of it. Had the Bushnell 1000 but it's too big. The shorter range ones didn't reach far enough.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2009, 01:24:36 PM by bearpaw »
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline Wanttohuntmore

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1957
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #19 on: July 26, 2009, 10:35:09 PM »
My Bushnel scout is rated for 700 on a reflective target.  I get out to about 500 routinely on non-reflective, and have had up to 760 on reflective, if everything is just right.  I keep looking at the swaro but still can't justify it, yet.....

Offline batch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 197
  • Location: NE Oregon
  • YAT YAS
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #20 on: July 26, 2009, 10:39:07 PM »
I have a 1500 bushnell that i use quite a bit at work and i have a hard time getting anything over 1000 on it but like others say it depends alot on the conditions. I am sure better quality ones are more accurate and reliable but hey it was for free.
In this country we have no place for hyphenated Americans.

Offline scudmaster

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 370
  • Location: North Bend, WA
  • Aim Small, Miss Small!
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #21 on: August 07, 2009, 09:12:17 AM »
I have a Brunton Echo 440 and have ranged over 530 yards on white bouies in the lake.  And 400 on grass and trees on the golf course as well.
NRA Life Member
WA Wild Sheep Life Member
Snoqualmie Elk Mgmt Group
RMEF Member
BHA Member
Blue Lives Matter

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: Rangefinders - what actual ranges are you getting from yours?
« Reply #22 on: August 12, 2009, 03:53:18 PM »
High 1300's out of my Leica CRF 1200.  However, my last Leica 1200, which wasn't the scan model, got a lot more readings at long distances. :dunno:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 Crab! by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:43:49 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by Dan-o
[Today at 09:29:51 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by washingtonmuley
[Today at 09:23:31 AM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 09:20:27 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 09:18:45 AM]


Kings by washingtonmuley
[Today at 08:42:03 AM]


Bear behavior by brew
[Today at 08:40:20 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Today at 05:27:26 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:09:14 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 02:08:31 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 01:52:01 PM]


Blue Mtn Foothills West Rifle Tag by Trooper
[Yesterday at 01:18:40 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Yesterday at 01:01:22 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by jrebel
[Yesterday at 11:20:33 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 11:12:46 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal