collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80  (Read 11683 times)

Offline grizzlygibbs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 339
  • Location: Wenatchee
Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« on: August 22, 2009, 11:17:11 PM »

Do you guys think $1500 is a fair price for a 20-60X65 sts spotting scope?  What are some pros and cons of 65 mm objective and should I hold out for an 80mm?

I just want the best but cannot afford HD or new.

Offline G.R.K

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 365
  • Location: East Buckley
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2009, 11:24:49 PM »
65 mm if you want to pack it/80 mm for the truck.  :twocents:
Losing is natures' way of saying you suck.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32890
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2009, 11:36:37 PM »
Thats a good price if you compare to new, about $400 off. I like mine, it fits in my pack with a compact tripod although its not light weight. When comparing to the 80 you really are talking about hair splitting, I wouldnt worry about it. :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline BlackTail

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 317
  • Location: Chinook
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2009, 02:56:50 PM »
phool,  do you have the 65 or the 80?

Online jjhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 2258
  • Location: Mule Deer Country
  • Aim small. Miss small.
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2009, 04:11:28 PM »
I bought the 65 because I walk a lot and although there may not be a substantial difference in weight there is a substantial size difference between the 65 and 80.  My STS 65 fits in my pack with ease and takes up minimal room.  If you like to get out and get after it - the 65 is the scope of choice :twocents:  You can always buy an 80mm body later if you get old an need to road hunt :chuckle:  

Offline Intruder

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1722
  • Location: Spo-Vegas
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2009, 10:42:02 AM »
Luggin around an 80 is a bitch.  Lugging around a 65 is a bitch.... but much less of one.  I wouldn't consider packing an 80 around anymore. More $, more weight, heaviear tripod, more expensive tripod.... no thanks. 

Offline Red Dawg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 1945
  • Location: Granger, WA
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #6 on: August 28, 2009, 06:42:00 AM »
I pack around a 62mm leica spotter and love it. I dont think I would want to go any larger in my pack. Besides you most likely dont need the bigger objective unless you are going blind or doing lots of bird watching.

Offline grizzlygibbs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 339
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #7 on: August 28, 2009, 07:15:50 AM »
Thanks guys I am gonna hold out until I am done with school as I am not gonna be able to hunt as much as I want for two years.  Should give me plenty of time to save up, maybe even for an HD and a nice tripod and head

Offline BIGBULLBALLS

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 146
  • Location: Is just a state of mind
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #8 on: August 28, 2009, 08:05:45 AM »
Buy the HD Swarovski.  I bought the ATS 80 HD and it blows all other scopes out of the water IMO.  My buddy has the STS 80 non-HD and I get at least 15 minutes more glassing time than he does early mornings and late evenings.  15 minutes does not sound like much but that is when the big boys step out.  I paid $2850 for scope, eye piece, Bogen carbon fiber tripod, and Bogen fluid filled head.  Awesome setup

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2009, 05:12:12 PM »
if you are going to use it for a hunting outfit, give a serious look at the 15-56 binos on a tripod. I sold my 80mm ed spotter cause the binos were so much more friendly to hunt with.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32890
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2009, 04:05:30 PM »
phool,  do you have the 65 or the 80?

 I bought the 65, I can get it in my daypack but couldn't fit the 80.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2009, 04:14:05 PM »
The 15x56 with a tripod are unbeatable until you need more magnification at a long distance.  That's the only reason I prefer the spotting scope.   :twocents:  If I had more room I'd pack them both!

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32890
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #12 on: September 15, 2009, 04:19:18 PM »
Quote
If I had more room I'd pack them both!

I pack my 65 and my EL 10X42's ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2009, 08:00:14 AM »
Okay, I pack my EL's around my neck too, just not the big 15x56SLCs! :)

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2009, 12:46:28 PM »
I pack my 20x60x82mm Nikon Pro Staff in my Badlands Hypervent.....not a problem.  Fits fine and very little difference in weight over a 65mm when riding in its own compartment.  I personally would rather have the extra early/late light benefit.  But then again I've been known to pack my 20x70 Fujinon bino's around....heavy? ...yes....but when I need to look....priceless.    :twocents:
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[Today at 12:49:31 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by elkchaser54
[Today at 12:00:50 PM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by MeepDog
[Today at 11:56:56 AM]


Nevada Results by jae
[Today at 11:25:17 AM]


The time clock has started.....and go. by jstone
[Today at 10:34:04 AM]


Drano Lake Springers by metlhead
[Today at 10:00:01 AM]


Knight ridge runner by JakeLand
[Today at 09:54:37 AM]


Last year putting in… by pianoman9701
[Today at 09:02:32 AM]


Desert Sheds by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:29:50 AM]


Oregon spring bear by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:34:52 AM]


1oz cannon balls by GWP
[Today at 07:29:23 AM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:54:26 PM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by follow maggie
[Yesterday at 05:27:14 PM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by Platensek-po
[Yesterday at 01:59:06 PM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[May 23, 2025, 09:20:43 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal