collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW Enforcement Study  (Read 2020 times)

Offline dbllunger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 1072
  • Those who can do. Those who can't complain.
WDFW Enforcement Study
« on: September 30, 2009, 10:53:32 AM »
http://wdfw.wa.gov/enforcement/iacp_staffing_study.html

Found this on the web sight.  Probably biased a little, but it appears that the enforcement division is substantially understaffed on the guy working in the field side. 

Offline Okano-gun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 99
  • Location: Twisp
Re: WDFW Enforcement Study
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2009, 10:36:52 AM »
148 officers for the whole state, including the marine division. plus a court system that does not take fish and wildlife crimes seriously. no wonder theres so much poaching

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: WDFW Enforcement Study
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2009, 02:49:37 PM »
This demonstrates a big prioritization problem in WDFW; 1500+ employees, over half in Olympia.  I don't begrudge Olympia 800+ employees, except when it constrains having adequate resources deployed statewide.  This is an outcome of Czar Koenings' perception that WDFW should provide the Director's office unlimited support, and whatever was left over could be deployed to the field.  I hope Director Anderson takes a really hard look at the Department's resources and priorities from a core mission, rather than bureaucratic, perspective.  The state office should be supporting core mission functions in the field, rather than perpetuating state government.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: WDFW Enforcement Study
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2009, 02:55:37 PM »
I talked to my buddy at the Vail check station today and he was telling me about all of the violations that come through every day.  He said that they could pay to have 2 officers up there just in fines but they have only volunteers and no way to enforce the law. 

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: WDFW Enforcement Study
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2009, 03:15:58 PM »
This demonstrates a big prioritization problem in WDFW; 1500+ employees, over half in Olympia.  I don't begrudge Olympia 800+ employees, except when it constrains having adequate resources deployed statewide.  This is an outcome of Czar Koenings' perception that WDFW should provide the Director's office unlimited support, and whatever was left over could be deployed to the field.  I hope Director Anderson takes a really hard look at the Department's resources and priorities from a core mission, rather than bureaucratic, perspective.  The state office should be supporting core mission functions in the field, rather than perpetuating state government.

Too many administrative positions, including Regional offices...........always has been, probably always will be.  Don't expect anything to change. 
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

"Border Lands Conservation Act" courtesy of Mike Lee (R-UT) by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 11:00:32 PM]


New Hunter by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:53:51 PM]


Abandoned salmon nets on the Columbia River by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:51:08 PM]


How is late season whitetail hunting? Good, bad, decent? GMU 105/117? by BrockWeilep
[Yesterday at 09:43:45 PM]


My Wenaha bull by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 09:27:01 PM]


Any word on closers in Hancock Timberland x inc. unit 121 by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:00:53 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by ganghis
[Yesterday at 08:56:04 PM]


East Side Quail Numbers? by metlhead
[Yesterday at 08:17:09 PM]


Stevens double barrel 410 by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:39:01 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by blackdog
[Yesterday at 06:57:48 PM]


Durable scope advice by Ac04
[Yesterday at 06:55:22 PM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by blackpowderhunter
[Yesterday at 06:49:19 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Yesterday at 06:41:06 PM]


Taneum Elk Cow tag problem by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 06:37:41 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 06:19:46 PM]


Throwing a Hail Marry - Late Season Deer or Elk by Remnar
[Yesterday at 06:18:39 PM]


Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 05:33:03 PM]


Upland bird carry options by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 05:23:10 PM]


Camping Spot by Cwyatt4826
[Yesterday at 05:06:18 PM]


Swakane Deer by String Bender
[Yesterday at 04:25:34 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal