Okanogan Wolf Meeting

[MtnMuley]

Pretty f#*!*d up how ALL of the officers attended the meeting, and NO Sign of Fitkin.  Not much support of the management plan here, where the wolves live!!!

[Axle]

Wolfbait did a fine job of objectively painting a picture of the meeting along with analyzing why things were done the way they were. Governments like to keep track of people who are able to think for themselves. Things like this are carefully orchestrated and it is OK for us to give our own opinion of it.

As far as putting them up and down the I5 corridor - I say that is where they should go. It is the people in this area that have a stupid infatuation with these killing machines. Problem is, they don't want them in their yard; they want them in somebody else's yard. They just want to be able to drive out to the country to see all the fuzzy little wolves running around frolicking in the sun and playing with nature. After all - it won't cost them anything if it is done like that. But when one of those dangerous mutts comes near town, it will be a panic! Schools will lock down! It will be on evening news and the honorable game department will come to the rescue to put the animal back out where it belongs. It will be fitted with a radio collar to track its every move. This will put the public's mind at ease and put the game department in the glorious spotlight. And the fearless news person will tell us that the wolf was coming in to town because horrible people have invaded its territory. But don't worry, the spokesperson for the game department will assure everyone in the city that their children will be safe for now. The wolf will then be taken out and dumped next to a farm where there is lots of cattle and sheep and goats to eat but the public will be told that it was returned to its "natural habitat".

This is easy to predict. Just look at what has happened with cougars. The city folks don't want us hunting them with hounds. Heck!, they don't want us hunting them at all but when one comes near or into town what do they do? They lock down parks, schools, green belts etc. etc. and then the gamies have to come in and rescue the city folks. It makes the news too. Why this is news worthy is beyond me. After all, they voted for this and yet don't want what they voted for once they get it. Then the cat gets returned to its "natural habitat" for somebody else to have to deal with and the news personell tell us the problem is "human encroachment". Bad humans! You should know better!

I have a relative that was absolutely infatuated with wolves after seeing them in a popular movie. He then obtained a wolf/dog hybrid to satisfy his dream and told people the ever popular lie that wolves have never attacked a human. I told him he was wrong. One of my neighbors (at that time) had to defend himself and his sister in Minnesota in the '30s from a wolf. It attacked them and he had to kill the wolf. The hybrid my relative got was trouble in a big way so he got rid of it and got another one. The second was even more trouble and it cost them a small fortune from the damage it did. He and his wife lost the infatuation with wolves.

There is an agenda and I doubt the meetings have anything to do with 'them' being interested in what the public really has to say. If so, this would not continue the way it is. The vast majority of the public wants nothing to do with wolves coming back.

[mulehunter]

Thank u Wolfbait.  I heard Scott Fitkin wont make it at the meeting, so I wouldnt come and waste my time listen to all BSing...... with this bitch.

They just want to push US away from them and tell us ALL LIES!

This picture was take by Biologlist most recently, U KNOW WHAT they start to use "Black and White" Picture from now on. Because they dont want people to know what Color each Wolf in pics Because I HAVE COLLECTED ALL PICTURES OF TRAILSCAMERA THAT I KNOW MORE THAN THEM and they dont want to tell us how many they KNEW IT that they have more than 19 or more but FOR SURE two packs! Thats Explains why Biologlist is trying to AVOID everything AS POSSIBLE!

Go figure!

Mulehunter  

[WDFW-SUX]

black and white vs color.. thats interesting MH

[Axle]

I see two wolves.

Can you see the other one?

[mulehunter]

I see two wolves.

Can you see the other one?

   People dont have to BELIEVE ME OR THEM THE WDFW, Well u can look at My TrailCamera pic of mother's NIPPLES in Carlton, Wa, How many PUPS in WOOD today after two half years of TrailCamera that I have collected,  More and More pups growing.


Mulehunter  

[wolfbait]

This winter Mulehunter, we are going to get pictures, just follow the blood trails of whats left of the deer. Wolf group said last night there were only two packs, the Lookout pack had six or 7 wolves. They had already been caught in so many lies, I figured what the hell, this winter the truth will come out, n how are they going to explain all of the wolves that drop to the valley floor. It's goin to be very interesting.

[Axle]

I'm serious. There are two wolves in the first picture.

can you see the other one? Hard to spot.

[andrew_12gauge]

yea i see the second one

[mossback91]

yea i see the second one

 

[andrew_12gauge]

yea i see the second one

 

what up with that moss, i let phool use me for a test dummy earlier cant get back into chat now

[WAcoyotehunter]

Thanks for a concise and unbiased report wolfbait.  I can't believe the WDFW did not want to hear what you had to say...weird. 

[CoryTDF]

Thanks for a concise and unbiased report wolfbait.  I can't believe the WDFW did not want to hear what you had to say...weird. 

At least he is out there voicing an opinion. That is more than i can say for myself. I would like to go to these meetings but work always gets in the way and most of the time they are to far to drive in an afternoon. I give props to anybody who is going to the meetings and voicing an opinion about our wolf problem. It's more than most of us can say.

[wolfbait]

Thanks for a concise and unbiased report wolfbait.  I can't believe the WDFW did not want to hear what you had to say...weird. 

Here ya go wacoyote, The wolves will not effect the big game herds of Washington, they are a shy critter.

Hope you are happy now.

[Little Dave]

At the Seattle meeting, the panel did take notes when citizens were speaking.  Most of the questions voiced during the comment period were restated and answered by the panel before fielding new questions from people in the audience that had not prepared a statement.

Whatever option in the plan is selected, the document does not need to be an opinion piece on hunting.  It was one of the primary points that I made in my statement.

One problem with the "let's teach them a lesson" approach (releasing wolves along the I-5 corridor to increase wolf/human incidents) is that people are already biased toward the urban environment.  They stay inside.  They watch the Weather Channel instead of the weather.  Of particular interests is the youth and all their stupid technical gadgets draining precious moments of their formative years away.

Face value, it sounds like a just retaliatory action.  For stewardship though, it is not.