collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Binoc Comparison  (Read 6761 times)

Offline oldschool

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 311
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2009, 04:26:49 PM »
 Thanks for all the input I'm like a kid in a candy store. :P

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2009, 10:54:30 PM »
HI I was wondering what warranty Zen Ray has on the 10x43 ED

From Zen Ray's sight.....................

The following products carry transferable limited lifetime warranty:

    * 2009 Model VISTA, MARINER, ZRS, and ZEN ED Binoculars
    * SEDONA Spotting Scope

Zen-Ray guarantees your product to be free of defects in materials and workmanship for the lifetime of the product. These warranties do not cover consumer caused damages such as misuse, abuse or repairs attempted by someone other than our authorized technicians.
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline Thefisherman83

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: Tenino
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2009, 12:30:22 AM »
I got the 12x42 camo Monarch's in sept. for just under $300.  I believe they are still coming with a $50 mail in rebate(I lost mine  :bash:)
Hunting and Fishing are not matters of life or death... THEY ARE WAY MORE IMPORTANT!!!

"Nothing Makes a fish bigger than almost being caught."

Poles are for skiing, Rods are for fishing!
Team Loomis!

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2009, 04:39:29 AM »
for the wet side 8x42 leupold works great.

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5027
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2009, 09:26:47 PM »
I would get anything less than 10 power, and at least a 40+mm objective.

Offline royalbull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 519
  • Location: ENUMCLAW
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #20 on: November 21, 2009, 09:25:08 AM »
I would put the $350 in the safe and keep saving

Offline HUNT

  • Site Sponsor
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1137
  • Location: Packard
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #21 on: November 21, 2009, 09:52:31 AM »
 :yeah:

You'll never regret it!
Rack'd Up Outdoors

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

New bow ideas by Dreaded Archer24
[Today at 02:13:44 PM]


Winthrop wolves by bigmacc
[Today at 02:13:23 PM]


maybe a shooter by greenhead_killer
[Today at 02:07:33 PM]


management buck by greenhead_killer
[Today at 02:06:29 PM]


New record WA shiras by teanawayslayer
[Today at 01:45:02 PM]


PRIME CENTERGY by highside74
[Today at 01:18:39 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by Ridgeratt
[Today at 12:46:39 PM]


Build a 7mm Weatherby mag by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 12:12:59 PM]


Blueprint for next year by Ghost Hunter
[Today at 11:01:38 AM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by JakeLand
[Today at 09:35:56 AM]


Idaho Billy by redi
[Today at 08:50:50 AM]


Florida Bear Hunt by kodiak06
[Today at 08:02:25 AM]


Handgun for grouse by hunter399
[Today at 03:16:47 AM]


Dodge 48re transmission recommendations by Fastass350
[Yesterday at 07:28:54 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal