collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Binoc Comparison  (Read 6765 times)

Offline oldschool

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 311
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2009, 04:26:49 PM »
 Thanks for all the input I'm like a kid in a candy store. :P

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2009, 10:54:30 PM »
HI I was wondering what warranty Zen Ray has on the 10x43 ED

From Zen Ray's sight.....................

The following products carry transferable limited lifetime warranty:

    * 2009 Model VISTA, MARINER, ZRS, and ZEN ED Binoculars
    * SEDONA Spotting Scope

Zen-Ray guarantees your product to be free of defects in materials and workmanship for the lifetime of the product. These warranties do not cover consumer caused damages such as misuse, abuse or repairs attempted by someone other than our authorized technicians.
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline Thefisherman83

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: Tenino
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2009, 12:30:22 AM »
I got the 12x42 camo Monarch's in sept. for just under $300.  I believe they are still coming with a $50 mail in rebate(I lost mine  :bash:)
Hunting and Fishing are not matters of life or death... THEY ARE WAY MORE IMPORTANT!!!

"Nothing Makes a fish bigger than almost being caught."

Poles are for skiing, Rods are for fishing!
Team Loomis!

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2009, 04:39:29 AM »
for the wet side 8x42 leupold works great.

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5028
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2009, 09:26:47 PM »
I would get anything less than 10 power, and at least a 40+mm objective.

Offline royalbull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 519
  • Location: ENUMCLAW
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #20 on: November 21, 2009, 09:25:08 AM »
I would put the $350 in the safe and keep saving

Offline HUNT

  • Site Sponsor
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1137
  • Location: Packard
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #21 on: November 21, 2009, 09:52:31 AM »
 :yeah:

You'll never regret it!
Rack'd Up Outdoors

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho on the verge of outlawing by huntnnw
[Today at 09:55:55 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by huntnnw
[Today at 09:54:59 PM]


Another reloading newb question by GWP
[Today at 09:38:05 PM]


Dodge trucks by nwhunter
[Today at 09:28:10 PM]


Tis The Season by Blacklab
[Today at 08:50:12 PM]


Winchester SX3 problem by ASHQUACK
[Today at 08:38:40 PM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by kodiak06
[Today at 08:22:52 PM]


WTS: Long Hunter in D2, Osage Orange by jrebel
[Today at 08:20:18 PM]


New bow ideas by blackveltbowhunter
[Today at 07:19:46 PM]


PRIME CENTERGY by Three Pines
[Today at 06:10:49 PM]


From Behind by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 03:54:31 PM]


Are all case trimmers created equal? by EnglishSetter
[Today at 03:21:47 PM]


Winthrop wolves by ghosthunter
[Today at 03:00:59 PM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by CarbonHunter
[Today at 01:26:46 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Today at 01:01:44 PM]


Drew Moose Tag by throttlejocky20
[Today at 11:17:21 AM]


Dodge 48re transmission recommendations by baker5150
[Today at 08:28:35 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal