collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Binoc Comparison  (Read 7067 times)

Offline oldschool

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 312
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2009, 04:26:49 PM »
 Thanks for all the input I'm like a kid in a candy store. :P

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2009, 10:54:30 PM »
HI I was wondering what warranty Zen Ray has on the 10x43 ED

From Zen Ray's sight.....................

The following products carry transferable limited lifetime warranty:

    * 2009 Model VISTA, MARINER, ZRS, and ZEN ED Binoculars
    * SEDONA Spotting Scope

Zen-Ray guarantees your product to be free of defects in materials and workmanship for the lifetime of the product. These warranties do not cover consumer caused damages such as misuse, abuse or repairs attempted by someone other than our authorized technicians.
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline Thefisherman83

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: Tenino
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2009, 12:30:22 AM »
I got the 12x42 camo Monarch's in sept. for just under $300.  I believe they are still coming with a $50 mail in rebate(I lost mine  :bash:)
Hunting and Fishing are not matters of life or death... THEY ARE WAY MORE IMPORTANT!!!

"Nothing Makes a fish bigger than almost being caught."

Poles are for skiing, Rods are for fishing!
Team Loomis!

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2009, 04:39:29 AM »
for the wet side 8x42 leupold works great.

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5106
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2009, 09:26:47 PM »
I would get anything less than 10 power, and at least a 40+mm objective.

Offline royalbull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 517
  • Location: ENUMCLAW
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #20 on: November 21, 2009, 09:25:08 AM »
I would put the $350 in the safe and keep saving

Offline HUNT

  • Site Sponsor
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1137
  • Location: Packard
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #21 on: November 21, 2009, 09:52:31 AM »
 :yeah:

You'll never regret it!
Rack'd Up Outdoors

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 11:40:47 PM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:33:49 PM]


Chasing the kids by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:38:39 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by CP
[Yesterday at 07:16:06 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 06:31:00 PM]


Questions regarding WDFW Commissioner use of taxpayer money by Jake Dogfish
[Yesterday at 06:29:24 PM]


Big game season proposals by Ghost Hunter
[Yesterday at 04:40:21 PM]


Your biggest spike elk by carlyoungs
[Yesterday at 04:09:27 PM]


Can't miss this girl by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 02:18:40 PM]


Stop the Coyote "game" classification proposal by hunter399
[Yesterday at 05:06:55 AM]


Big Changes for USFS by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 03:32:05 AM]


My pics from over the years by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 01:48:58 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal