collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Succesful, BUT, Done with Idaho  (Read 7502 times)

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 11931
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: Succesful, BUT, Done with Idaho
« Reply #15 on: November 24, 2009, 11:13:37 PM »
I keep hearing the same thing... lots of wolves, no deer/elk.  Too bad, I was kicking around the idea of hunting there next year...
COngrats on your buck though.
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline BOOM!!

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 292
  • Location: Yakima
Re: Succesful, BUT, Done with Idaho
« Reply #16 on: November 26, 2009, 05:53:52 PM »

Too bad the harvest statistics don't show the real harvest numbers.

I also wonder why the stats appear to be normal. I just got back from hunting WT in unit 5 and it is quite obvious that the last 2 winters have hit the deer numbers hard. Yet the stats show everthing is fine. They wouldn't pad the numbers just to sell tags would they?
BOOM ...That's funny ....BOOM !

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6032
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Succesful, BUT, Done with Idaho
« Reply #17 on: November 26, 2009, 08:10:25 PM »
Actually the stats for the unit I was hunting took a DRASTIC fall for the 2008 season and I suspect this year will be worse. Also its not only the numbers of deer that have decreased it also seems to be a lack of mature animals (I know that seems strange)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Succesful, BUT, Done with Idaho
« Reply #18 on: November 27, 2009, 09:14:56 AM »

Too bad the harvest statistics don't show the real harvest numbers.

I also wonder why the stats appear to be normal. I just got back from hunting WT in unit 5 and it is quite obvious that the last 2 winters have hit the deer numbers hard. Yet the stats show everthing is fine. They wouldn't pad the numbers just to sell tags would they?

Ask s.fitkin about numbers!

Offline Red Dawg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 1945
  • Location: Granger, WA
Re: Succesful, BUT, Done with Idaho
« Reply #19 on: November 27, 2009, 09:44:14 AM »
 i noticed the same on our hunt their. number of mature animals is way down but predation is way up. overall numbers also seemed wat down. looks like you still had a good hunt congrats. we saw 1 wolf and a couple cats. that seems to be the growing trend.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Today at 08:07:55 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by teanawayslayer
[Today at 05:57:24 PM]


Also looking for help deciding on a scope by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 05:49:13 PM]


6mm Creedmoor Gauges by pickardjw
[Today at 01:27:28 PM]


Brittany breeders by ghosthunter
[Today at 01:17:23 PM]


Kings by metlhead
[Today at 12:37:26 PM]


Fullsized Truck Opinion: HiMiNew vs LoMiOlder by rainshadow1
[Today at 11:46:04 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Today at 11:29:22 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 10:47:28 AM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by C-Money
[Today at 07:52:53 AM]


Velvet by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:35:16 PM]


Advice for a first time Bear spot and stalk? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 06:02:28 PM]


2025 Canning by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 05:00:03 PM]


WSTA 2025 Summer Rendezvous Agenda by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 03:09:35 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by JBar
[Yesterday at 02:20:40 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal