Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Scanned Photo Resolution Question (Read 1015 times)
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
on:
December 02, 2009, 11:52:30 AM »
If I scan a 35mm negative at 6400 x 9600 or close to it, will this produce a reasonable quality printed photo size 8 x 10 or 11 x 14?? "Reasonable" does not mean pro-quality, just reasonably good.
thanks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
popeshawnpaul
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3583
Location: Bellevue, WA
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #1 on:
December 02, 2009, 01:25:27 PM »
You are fine all the way down to 120 dpi or dots per inch. I prefer 300 dpi if I can. If you are making an 8x10 that would be 2400x3000 pixels. You might want to scan at a higher resolution than that and then downsize it to make it look better. Scanning at more than the optical resolution would be a waste and would more than likely not look better. I think most scanners optically max out at 3000 or 4000 dpi. Avoid interpolated or digital resolution above the optical maximum.
Your print will look fine.
Logged
www.WSBowhunters.com
www.shawnmccully.com
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #2 on:
December 02, 2009, 06:40:52 PM »
Thanks Shawn. I am maybe looking at more scanner than I really need. You answer to a similar question a long time ago was to rent a photo scanner from an outfit in Seattle which was a great suggestion..but that option just won't work for me now.
Tks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
Hunting by Republic/Ferry county
by
Skillet
[
Yesterday
at 11:54:24 PM]
suppressor for a 7mm-08
by
dreadi
[
Yesterday
at 11:06:20 PM]
Mixed bag in ND
by
JProper
[
Yesterday
at 10:38:41 PM]
Cougar information
by
JProper
[
Yesterday
at 10:22:38 PM]
Wasted Bethel bull
by
firepin
[
Yesterday
at 10:03:29 PM]
Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question
by
blackveltbowhunter
[
Yesterday
at 09:55:15 PM]
As He Lay
by
Dan-o
[
Yesterday
at 09:14:00 PM]
Pork belly burnt ends
by
jrebel
[
Yesterday
at 08:49:42 PM]
2025 deer, let's see em!
by
highside74
[
Yesterday
at 08:46:05 PM]
Sure glad cougars are solitary animals.
by
Okanagan
[
Yesterday
at 07:15:46 PM]
Second Chance Bull
by
carpsniperg2
[
Yesterday
at 06:29:54 PM]
"Border Lands Conservation Act" courtesy of Mike Lee (R-UT)
by
cjjcb
[
Yesterday
at 06:04:30 PM]
Hydrographics/dipping
by
elkaholic123
[
Yesterday
at 06:01:30 PM]
Cougar and an elk same pic/video
by
NOCK NOCK
[
Yesterday
at 05:16:10 PM]
Newbie quail hunter
by
buglebuster
[
Yesterday
at 05:05:12 PM]
MOVED: Sure glad cougars are solitary animals.
by
bearpaw
[
Yesterday
at 01:36:12 PM]
2025 elk success thread!!
by
brokentrail
[
Yesterday
at 01:23:12 PM]
Fishing the East Cape in Baja?
by
Rutnbuxnbulls
[
Yesterday
at 01:15:40 PM]
Illustration: Skinning for a bear rug
by
Hunting Cowboy
[
Yesterday
at 12:48:51 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal