Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Scanned Photo Resolution Question (Read 1017 times)
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
on:
December 02, 2009, 11:52:30 AM »
If I scan a 35mm negative at 6400 x 9600 or close to it, will this produce a reasonable quality printed photo size 8 x 10 or 11 x 14?? "Reasonable" does not mean pro-quality, just reasonably good.
thanks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
popeshawnpaul
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3583
Location: Bellevue, WA
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #1 on:
December 02, 2009, 01:25:27 PM »
You are fine all the way down to 120 dpi or dots per inch. I prefer 300 dpi if I can. If you are making an 8x10 that would be 2400x3000 pixels. You might want to scan at a higher resolution than that and then downsize it to make it look better. Scanning at more than the optical resolution would be a waste and would more than likely not look better. I think most scanners optically max out at 3000 or 4000 dpi. Avoid interpolated or digital resolution above the optical maximum.
Your print will look fine.
Logged
www.WSBowhunters.com
www.shawnmccully.com
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #2 on:
December 02, 2009, 06:40:52 PM »
Thanks Shawn. I am maybe looking at more scanner than I really need. You answer to a similar question a long time ago was to rent a photo scanner from an outfit in Seattle which was a great suggestion..but that option just won't work for me now.
Tks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
Such cool looking animals
by
pashok23
[
Today
at 04:07:56 PM]
Any buck clarification
by
Twispriver
[
Today
at 03:46:21 PM]
Idaho Unit 39 wolves
by
jstone
[
Today
at 03:19:50 PM]
2025 elk success thread!!
by
Boss .300 winmag
[
Today
at 02:06:40 PM]
Huck 121 Youth Elk
by
Parkern
[
Today
at 01:54:01 PM]
2025 blacktail rut thread
by
Mulie87
[
Today
at 01:11:29 PM]
Cash Poor/Equity Rich And Don't Want To Refinance
by
pianoman9701
[
Today
at 11:34:18 AM]
Big old and heavy
by
SkookumHntr
[
Today
at 11:19:28 AM]
Gots me a new/old rockchuck rifle coming
by
JDHasty
[
Today
at 10:48:41 AM]
Newbie quail hunter
by
salt n sage90
[
Today
at 10:46:32 AM]
Where should i hunt turkeys? Can anyone help?
by
birddogdad
[
Today
at 09:26:59 AM]
Hunting by Republic/Ferry county
by
mikey549
[
Today
at 09:25:05 AM]
LINCOLN !!
by
metlhead
[
Today
at 07:34:04 AM]
HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos
by
redi
[
Today
at 05:44:19 AM]
mushroom id on a hemlock
by
Timberstalker
[
Today
at 04:58:28 AM]
Grizzly?
by
huntnnw
[
Yesterday
at 11:22:50 PM]
2025 Quality Tag Hunt. 💥VIDEO 💥
by
Transam2340
[
Yesterday
at 09:23:59 PM]
2025 deer, let's see em!
by
Born2late
[
Yesterday
at 08:29:55 PM]
More special privileges
by
time2hunt
[
Yesterday
at 07:50:37 PM]
suppressor for a 7mm-08
by
dreadi
[
Yesterday
at 07:17:18 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal