collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80  (Read 11723 times)

Offline beardown

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 169
  • Location: Shelton
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2009, 12:55:09 PM »
The 15x56 with a tripod are unbeatable until you need more magnification at a long distance.  That's the only reason I prefer the spotting scope.   :twocents:  If I had more room I'd pack them both!


I have the 15x56's and the sts 20-60x80 HD scope I pack them both everywhere I go.  I bought my scope last year, but this years model is supposed to be lighter.  It is kinda heavy but I have looked through both side by side in low light my 80 walked all over the 65.  I guess it depends on if you are a wuss or not ;)

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2009, 04:08:12 PM »
If you could see my pack setup I doubt you'd be calling me a wuss. ;)

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2009, 04:42:24 PM »
The 15x56 with a tripod are unbeatable until you need more magnification at a long distance.  That's the only reason I prefer the spotting scope.   :twocents:  If I had more room I'd pack them both!


I have the 15x56's and the sts 20-60x80 HD scope I pack them both everywhere I go.  I bought my scope last year, but this years model is supposed to be lighter.  It is kinda heavy but I have looked through both side by side in low light my 80 walked all over the 65.  I guess it depends on if you are a wuss or not ;)


 :chuckle:
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline elk311

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 240
  • Location: Wet-stern WA
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #18 on: October 01, 2009, 01:11:57 PM »
I have the 80 STS HD. "leave the 80 in the truck" ??? :o Are you kidding me? This scope is SO LIGHTWEIGHT it's unreal and the optical clarity is second to none!!! NEVER EVER leave these scopes in the truck! They belong in the woods. :chuckle:
US Navy Submarine Force, Retired

Offline grizzlygibbs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 339
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2009, 06:52:10 PM »
I am defiantly gonna do a side by side comparison before I pull the trigger on this purchase.

Offline Craig

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 2211
  • Location: Olympia
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #20 on: October 23, 2009, 09:44:47 AM »
I have the STS 80 and love it. I do need a lighter tripod. Mine is like packing around a brick.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2009, 01:05:55 PM »
I am defiantly gonna do a side by side comparison before I pull the trigger on this purchase.

 If possible do it in the field under extreme conditions. I have a 65 you could borrow if you can find someone with a 80.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline grizzlygibbs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 339
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2009, 09:13:47 PM »
I will take you up on that phool, but it will be put on the back burner for a while.  I had a small window this summer to get one, then it got shot down by the warden.  Summer of 2011 will be a definite purchase of some good glass though!

Offline muley_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 13
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #23 on: December 20, 2009, 09:03:04 PM »
If you have the space in your pack go with the 80mm; I love mine and it fits perfectly in my Badlands 2200.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Mason County Youth Buck Nov 1-16 by Sundance
[Today at 11:36:57 AM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by Sundance
[Today at 11:34:34 AM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by zagsfan1
[Today at 11:00:13 AM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by dreamingbig
[Today at 10:44:31 AM]


Getting back into dogs by Machias
[Today at 10:40:03 AM]


VA Loan Closing Costs by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:20:51 AM]


DR Brush Mower won't crank by Sandberm
[Today at 09:58:05 AM]


Swakane Ram by Timberstalker
[Today at 09:46:56 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by vandeman17
[Today at 09:33:41 AM]


After a couple years of poor health,... by Skillet
[Today at 08:49:46 AM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 07:15:15 AM]


Drew Cleman Mountain Any Ram! by starbailey
[Today at 07:04:50 AM]


Anybody hunt with a 25 Creedmoor? by Threewolves
[Today at 05:58:47 AM]


2025 OILS! by oldschool
[Today at 05:33:29 AM]


September mule deer velvet by jstone
[Yesterday at 08:43:04 PM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 07:40:33 PM]


Goose hunting with vice grips by Pegasus
[Yesterday at 04:51:23 PM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by GeoSwan
[Yesterday at 04:12:47 PM]


Back up camera by Blacklab
[Yesterday at 11:54:30 AM]


Drew Quality by hunter399
[Yesterday at 11:12:45 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal