collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: SCI moose  (Read 2084 times)

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
SCI moose
« on: December 16, 2009, 10:41:21 AM »
I actually kind of like how SCI measures moose versus Boone.   They give credit for each tine length as well as palm.   I've seen some pretty cool moose with long tines.  Yes there are those that don't have palm, but then again they wouldn't get credit for it.   

Offline need2huntmor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 167
  • Location: Graham
Re: SCI moose
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2009, 08:58:01 PM »
I agree.  I like that you get all the measurements, and no deductions.  It seems to be a better assessment of the size of the trophy.

Offline bow4elk

  • Pacific Northwest Bowhunting
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 3413
  • Location: Olympia, WA
  • Contact me at: tom@pnwbowhunting.com
    • https://www.facebook.com/pacific.northwest.bowhunting/
    • Pacific Northwest Bowhunting
Re: SCI moose
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2009, 10:47:33 PM »
Agree Bone.  And I too love long-tines on moose.  I think they look better with with a palm lined with tines vs. one with smooth bumps.  Just personal preference, and without question I'd shoot a non-book moose that had all those points over a book moose without.  Character wins over record books for me every time.
Official Measurer: Pope and Young Club, NW Big Game Inc., National Muzzle Loading Rifle Association, Oregon Shed Hunters
First Hunt Foundation mentor
Washington State R3 Coordinator

Pacific Northwest Bowhunting http://www.pnwbowhunting.com

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal