collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80  (Read 12217 times)

Offline beardown

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 169
  • Location: Shelton
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2009, 12:55:09 PM »
The 15x56 with a tripod are unbeatable until you need more magnification at a long distance.  That's the only reason I prefer the spotting scope.   :twocents:  If I had more room I'd pack them both!


I have the 15x56's and the sts 20-60x80 HD scope I pack them both everywhere I go.  I bought my scope last year, but this years model is supposed to be lighter.  It is kinda heavy but I have looked through both side by side in low light my 80 walked all over the 65.  I guess it depends on if you are a wuss or not ;)

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8711
  • Location: NCW
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2009, 04:08:12 PM »
If you could see my pack setup I doubt you'd be calling me a wuss. ;)

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2009, 04:42:24 PM »
The 15x56 with a tripod are unbeatable until you need more magnification at a long distance.  That's the only reason I prefer the spotting scope.   :twocents:  If I had more room I'd pack them both!


I have the 15x56's and the sts 20-60x80 HD scope I pack them both everywhere I go.  I bought my scope last year, but this years model is supposed to be lighter.  It is kinda heavy but I have looked through both side by side in low light my 80 walked all over the 65.  I guess it depends on if you are a wuss or not ;)


 :chuckle:
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline elk311

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 240
  • Location: Wet-stern WA
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #18 on: October 01, 2009, 01:11:57 PM »
I have the 80 STS HD. "leave the 80 in the truck" ??? :o Are you kidding me? This scope is SO LIGHTWEIGHT it's unreal and the optical clarity is second to none!!! NEVER EVER leave these scopes in the truck! They belong in the woods. :chuckle:
US Navy Submarine Force, Retired

Offline grizzlygibbs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 339
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2009, 06:52:10 PM »
I am defiantly gonna do a side by side comparison before I pull the trigger on this purchase.

Offline Craig

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 2224
  • Location: Olympia
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #20 on: October 23, 2009, 09:44:47 AM »
I have the STS 80 and love it. I do need a lighter tripod. Mine is like packing around a brick.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32943
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2009, 01:05:55 PM »
I am defiantly gonna do a side by side comparison before I pull the trigger on this purchase.

 If possible do it in the field under extreme conditions. I have a 65 you could borrow if you can find someone with a 80.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline grizzlygibbs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 339
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2009, 09:13:47 PM »
I will take you up on that phool, but it will be put on the back burner for a while.  I had a small window this summer to get one, then it got shot down by the warden.  Summer of 2011 will be a definite purchase of some good glass though!

Offline muley_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 13
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #23 on: December 20, 2009, 09:03:04 PM »
If you have the space in your pack go with the 80mm; I love mine and it fits perfectly in my Badlands 2200.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

One of my Wowzhers by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Today at 09:23:53 PM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by jamesjett
[Today at 09:21:16 PM]


What are you cooking? by JDHasty
[Today at 08:25:09 PM]


Illinois, No Doubter by Birdguy
[Today at 07:14:46 PM]


How to change email? by boneaddict
[Today at 07:11:41 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Schmalzfam
[Today at 05:10:16 PM]


Canning Wild Game by Whitpirate
[Today at 04:24:26 PM]


Big old and heavy by Pathfinder101
[Today at 02:32:30 PM]


Pepper Jack tillimook by Fidelk
[Today at 02:30:19 PM]


Thanksgiving duck hunt by metlhead
[Today at 12:34:23 PM]


What boots? by fishngamereaper
[Today at 10:46:03 AM]


One-Day Approval!!! by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:34:17 AM]


Wowzers by shotguunar
[Today at 10:18:25 AM]


CWD test results 🤤🤫 by baldopepper
[Today at 09:50:23 AM]


High n Dry gear by GWP
[Today at 09:13:20 AM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by b23
[Today at 09:01:46 AM]


Idaho/Montana elk/deer lodges by Hiker82
[Today at 08:49:34 AM]


November 26,02025 Hunt by Delta Duckman
[Today at 07:13:29 AM]


GMU 111 antlered moose advice request by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 10:20:12 PM]


Big J's Black Friday sale by highside74
[Yesterday at 10:11:04 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal