collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Bi-pods  (Read 7748 times)

Offline JH

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 155
Bi-pods
« on: December 23, 2009, 08:29:44 PM »
Thinking about getting a bi-pod for my r-15 but am not sure on what height to go with. Do you guys have them, how do you like them and what height did you get?


Thanks Jason

Offline littlebuf

  • official YAR pack mule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 2773
  • Location: orting
  • TeamYARwetspot-leavin other teams in da wetspot
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2009, 08:36:57 PM »
in my opinion it would only make a heavy gun heavier and really tough to shoot off hand. i love my r-15 and am good with it off hand, a bi pod would screw it up. get some sticks and strap um to your pack  :twocents:
No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6029
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2009, 08:47:39 PM »
I only have a bi-pod on my AR for vermin, I have 2  a 6-9 and I have used a 13-23 in the past.
 Don't carry a bi-pod on my big game rifle for the same reasons littlebuf gave.

Offline Jburke

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1387
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2009, 12:39:07 AM »
It depends on whether you are shooting from a sitting position or laying down.  Sitting you will need at least the 13-23, maybe taller depending on how tall you are.  Shooting prone, the shorter version will be fine.

Offline JH

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 155
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2009, 12:51:03 AM »
Yeah this is not for my big game rifle I do too much hiking to pack around a bi-pod on it. I like that idea littlebuff of just getting some shooting sticks and throwing them on the pack.

Thanks for the input

Offline addicted

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 5300
  • Location: A forest near you
  • The famous FootDog
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2009, 03:06:34 AM »
6-9 for prone and bench. bigger one for sitting up. like varmin calling.


back in my day...... :chuckle:

got a harris bipod at walmart a few years ago for like 39$. i think the same one sells for 70$. the prices have been sky rocketing. they have been "improving" i guess. they put notches on the legs and now it can lean. i like having it to set my gun down anywhere when i go to take a pee in the woods. lol
"Right now, I am thinking that If my grandmother was here, she would be lecturing me about how there are poor people in Africa, that would just love to have a Ruger, I would just say "Great, granny, lets just ship all the Rugers to Africa!"


Loving life in the Great Northwest one day at a time.

It sounds like it's time to get a new gun.

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2009, 05:37:17 AM »
Having used a bi-pod for years on my hunting guns, I would say go for it. I use one that goes from 7" to 12". Does not make the gun any heaver or hard to shoot off hand. I have how ever made some great shots using it. I use them for my kids guns too.

Offline CoryTDF

  • Make it Rain!!!
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 3184
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • Look at me I'm blowing a duck call!
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2009, 06:16:52 AM »
If you do a search you will fins several threads on bi-pods. That said I would go with the Versa-Pod. You will not be disappointed. It is a little heavy but it is detachable and can swivel. This helps a lot when try to track a moving animal.
CoryTDF

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
- Edmund Burke (1729-1797), British statesman and philosopher

Offline littlebuf

  • official YAR pack mule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 2773
  • Location: orting
  • TeamYARwetspot-leavin other teams in da wetspot
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2009, 09:42:28 AM »
Does not make the gun any heaver or hard to shoot off hand.

Must be one of the new "no weight" ones... ;)


um yeah, id like to know where i could get a bi pod that adds no wieght to the rifle  :o
No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2009, 10:09:53 AM »
Big fan of shooting sticks here.  HardCorpsHunter gave me a neat set with a belt sheath, each stick is 3 sections of shock-corded aluminum, they straightenout and snap together as they are pulled out of the open-topped sheath.  Less than a second to deploy, lighter than a bipod, give 30" down to nothing just by spreading the legs.  they are secured at the top with one rubber o-ring around two rubber o-rings, one half each of the pair goes through the doubled o-rings. 
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2009, 10:36:15 AM »
In trying both for in the field use, When I have to shift where I am pointing (coyotes never come the way I think they will) I find it easier to shift with sticks then a bipod, the bipod catches on the brush more for me. I can either remove the rifle from the sticks and shoot from my knees or move the sticks and a little "butt scootin" LOL
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2009, 10:48:07 AM »
I don't use any sticks or bi pods.Just more stuff for me to pack.Haven't had a problem before needing them :dunno:

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #12 on: December 24, 2009, 01:04:10 PM »
Shooting sticks, versa-pod, or snipe-pod for varmint hunting.  Why, because these listed ones detach and can swivel from side to side.  Myself, I never leave home without some sort of bi-pod or sticks........ever. :twocents:

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12146
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2009, 01:32:43 PM »
I use a bi-pod on my big game guns and the dual pupose 7mm (does a nice job on yotes) my primary is an original m77 .338 so not real light, doesnt bother me with the weight and does not cause an issue with off hand shots and with the legs down feels more solid to me than across the pack  :dunno:
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline littlebuf

  • official YAR pack mule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 2773
  • Location: orting
  • TeamYARwetspot-leavin other teams in da wetspot
Re: Bi-pods
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2009, 02:35:13 PM »
i guess the real consideration would be is the extra weight worth the benefit. for me no, i hike a ton and cut as much weight as possible. stumps are free and i don't have to pack them around, there already where I'm going. if you don't get to far from the truck maybe its worth it. i still think your off hand shooting will suffer. especially those quick shots that are often the reason your shooting off hand.  :twocents:
No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal