collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ruger hawkeye??  (Read 7721 times)

Offline mossback91

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3197
Ruger hawkeye??
« on: January 17, 2008, 10:17:36 PM »
Does anybody have one? What do you think of it? Like the action?

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6051
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2008, 10:30:31 PM »
I looked at them and like the 77 better and the new hawkeye cost more.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2008, 08:09:09 AM »
I looked at them and like the 77 better and the new hawkeye cost more.

a huge improvement IMO worth the money......well gas is $3.00 a gallon now. rugers were $350 when gas was $.99.................seems relative

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2008, 08:46:06 AM »
I like them and if I was in the market for a new rifle I'd definitely take a hard look at the Ruger first. The new hawkeye is supposed to have a much improved trigger. The old 77's were known for their terrible triggers.

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6051
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2008, 09:41:50 PM »
The old rugers did have terrible triggers but compare an old 77MK2 with the hawkeye. Really look at them side by side. They are not as well built and all of the wood I have seen so far isn't as nice. I have only looked at 3 though. The gunshop where I was comparing them the hawkeye was $100 more.
 

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2008, 10:31:26 PM »
I'd pay $100 for a stock, and if you own a ruger pre hawkeye you prolly bought a stock......or throw your puppy in the microwave because the factory stock pisses you off so bad.

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6051
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2008, 08:09:44 AM »
 I was talking about the wood stocks on the M77 being nicer. Not the Zytel canoe paddles the call a synthetic stocks.  :chuckle:

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2008, 09:29:37 AM »
I was talking about the wood stocks on the M77 being nicer. Not the Zytel canoe paddles the call a synthetic stocks.  :chuckle:

so was I ;). the m77 wood stock is easily the worst ever, right behind the birch savage. could they have made it any chunkier? I think not. the hawkeye is way more slim and efficient then the m77......they throw in a better finish and trigger for the cost of the stock.....good deal.

Offline mossback91

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3197
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2008, 11:25:20 AM »
I was looking at the all weather model.

Offline mossback91

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3197
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2008, 12:37:48 PM »
Have any of you shot one? or do any of you own one?

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6051
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2008, 02:47:37 PM »
I was talking about the wood stocks on the M77 being nicer. Not the Zytel canoe paddles the call a synthetic stocks.  :chuckle:

so was I ;). the m77 wood stock is easily the worst ever, right behind the birch savage.
It must be the luck of the draw, I have a 77MK1 with a wood stock that would rival a Winchester super grade. With that said I don't have a hunting rifle that isn't synthetic.

Offline Bigshooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 6369
  • Location: Lewis Co
  • High Wide And Heavy
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2008, 02:23:56 PM »
The only thing a m77 is good for is a boat anchor.  Have looked at a few hawkeyes though and have to admit they look and feel pretty nice.  Am considering buy one in the new 375.
Welcome to liberal America, where the truth is condemned and facts are ignored so as not to "offend" anyone


"Borders, language, culture."

Offline Dakota Dogman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 86
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2008, 06:36:06 PM »
Just got one in .358 Win. before moving west.  Only shot about 1/2 box of shells through it.  Only one real complaint is the tiny safety has sharp edges.  Not real condusive to fast work or thick gloves.  Feeds well, shoots well, I'm pleased with all but that one little thing.  

Just MHO, but Ruger bolt actions are work horses, not show ponies.  Thick?  Yes.  Ugly? Probably.  Reliable? Almost always.

God Bless,

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Entiat Modern hunting by boneaddict
[Today at 12:05:15 PM]


Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by Bearhunter308
[Today at 12:01:34 PM]


Cougar and an elk same pic/video by Crunchy
[Today at 11:55:31 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by boneaddict
[Today at 11:53:54 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by muleyslayer
[Today at 11:01:39 AM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by Twispriver
[Today at 10:15:23 AM]


Big buck, bad eye by 2MANY
[Today at 08:59:17 AM]


CITES hide sealer and Fur Harvesters Receiving Agent info Pt 1 by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:35:28 AM]


Color phase fox by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:32:56 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:19:02 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:18:03 AM]


re-barreling a gun by Wingin it
[Today at 06:52:34 AM]


Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by Wingin it
[Today at 06:45:11 AM]


Possible record bull? by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:44:10 AM]


My new BB Gun by FlyFish360
[Today at 03:09:02 AM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by Berner5
[Yesterday at 09:18:43 PM]


Research Request - Deer, Moose & Elk Samples by cjc23
[Yesterday at 09:09:08 PM]


We lost one of our own (Colockumelk) by cem3434
[Yesterday at 08:46:12 PM]


Found tripod by royalbull
[Yesterday at 06:49:42 PM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by bb76
[Yesterday at 06:10:17 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal