collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Oh No!  (Read 21009 times)

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39213
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #75 on: January 11, 2010, 03:22:31 PM »
Somewhere between the Unit A and hat A, you lost me. I guess we must have had different statistics classes. Oh well, it makes no difference, as it sounds like they're staying with the 4 choices, but adding another 4 for the antlerless pool.

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #76 on: January 11, 2010, 05:08:04 PM »
But boneaddict, we don't know what people would do if they were only allowed 1 or 2 choices. It could be that if people only had 1 choice, they wouldn't apply for the Entiat, knowing it is one of the most popular mule deer permits, and maybe the majority would then only apply for your Methow permits, making your odds worse. That's all I've been saying all along, is we don't know how odds would change for each permit. Some would be better odds, some worse. But overall, odds would stay exactly the same.

I agree. We don't know what others will apply for, but we do know that some units will recieve less applicants. Those units could change year by year depending on harvest statistics.

Like I said before, I saw a units applicants more then triple the year they went to 4 choices.






Offline Lowedog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2584
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #77 on: January 11, 2010, 07:32:50 PM »
Hey Bobcat, you might as well just give up on these guys.  You know what comedian Ron White says..... :chuckle:
"Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal."
— Aldo Leopold

Offline Ridgerunner

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5106
  • Location: Enumclaw
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #78 on: January 12, 2010, 07:28:09 PM »
This has been an entertaining read, I think if choices were limited then what Bobcat is saying would come true, and for teh record I have been advocating limiting your choice to OIL species since before I drew a moose tag.  I'm sure you can find a dozen posts of mine to that effect, what I'd like to see before that is making us front the tag fees or increase the cost to apply.  $$$$ for the state and better odds for us serious about those tags.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #79 on: January 12, 2010, 07:30:52 PM »
Its statistically improbable that any unit would have worse odds... YAWN
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho Non-Res draw results by MuleyTracksWA
[Today at 03:17:48 PM]


School me on cast iron! by jamesfromseattle
[Today at 02:51:10 PM]


Arizona credit card hits by jae
[Today at 02:40:25 PM]


Cage Trapping Bobcats by 3nails
[Today at 01:18:33 PM]


bc style down rigger rod by Night goat
[Today at 01:14:55 PM]


Fall bear season to be minimized by Pathfinder101
[Today at 12:03:40 PM]


Drake Boat Blind installation instruction manual request by Geoffphrye123456
[Today at 11:40:08 AM]


Oregon spring bear results by Doublelunger
[Today at 10:18:44 AM]


Laser sight/pointer by bearhunter99
[Today at 09:22:07 AM]


test by Jamieb
[Today at 08:50:25 AM]


Pacific Northwest - The Beautiful Cookbook by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:45:13 AM]


new mexico oryx by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:34:00 AM]


2026 Seattle Sportmen's Convention - March 7, 2026 by wa.hunter
[Today at 06:50:33 AM]


Bleeding a sturgeon? by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 09:18:36 PM]


Texas Axis Deer Hunting by jstone
[Yesterday at 06:53:23 PM]


Is this barrel bent? by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 03:29:37 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal