Author Topic: What does this set of anlers score? Mule deer (Read 6218 times)

huntergreg · « **on:** January 17, 2010, 01:18:05 PM »

I got these a few years back from a house we Bought to remodel. they were hanging up in a garage. Just wondering what you think they might score. We will see if anyone can come close I went to Boon and Crockett and measured it. so star you guesses.

Huntbear · « **Reply #1 on:** January 17, 2010, 01:30:04 PM »

NWBREW · « **Reply #2 on:** January 17, 2010, 01:30:53 PM »

145 3/8"

DOUBLELUNG · « **Reply #3 on:** January 17, 2010, 01:32:43 PM »

144 net

Crowns · « **Reply #4 on:** January 17, 2010, 01:38:33 PM »

149" Net.

huntergreg · « **Reply #5 on:** January 17, 2010, 01:52:00 PM »

B. Tip to Tip Spread 11 1/8
C. Greatest Spread
19 1/8
D. Inside Spread of Main Beams 16
SPREAD CREDIT MAY EQUAL BUT NOT EXCEED LONGER ANTLER
16
E. Total of Lengths of Abnormal Points 0

left beam right beam Difference
F. Length of Main Beam 17 3/4 18 3/4 1
G-1. Length of First Point 0 1 1/4 1 2/8
G-2. Length of Second Point 21 1/8 20 1/8 1
G-3. Length of Third Point 9 3/4 8 7/8 7/8
G-4. Length of Fourth Point 9 1/2 10 4/8

right left difference
H-1. Circumference at Smallest Place Between First and Second Points 4 1/4 5 1/8 7/8
H-2. Circumference at Smallest Place Between Second and Third Points 4 1/4 4 5/8 3/8
H-3. Circumference at Smallest Place Between Third and Fourth Points 3 3/4 3 7/8 1/8
H-4. Circumference at Smallest Place Between Fourth and Fifth Points 4 3 7/8 1/8
TOTALS
16 74 3/8 76 4/8 6 1/8
ADD

Column 1
16 Exact Locality Where Killed:
Column 2
74 3/8 Date Killed: Hunter:
Column 3
76 4/8 Owner: Telephone:
Subtotal
166 7/8 Owner's Address:
SUBTRACT Column 4
6 1/8 Guide's Name & Address:
FINAL SCORE
160 6/8

boneaddict · « **Reply #6 on:** January 17, 2010, 02:01:59 PM »

I'd still say 140. Eyeguards don't look big enough to count, and the backs don't look nearly 20+. Sure you measured the same deer.

C-Money · « **Reply #7 on:** January 17, 2010, 02:03:25 PM »

I thought mid 130's? Great buck!

huntergreg · « **Reply #8 on:** January 17, 2010, 02:07:43 PM »

I am not an expert measure but i measured it how it said. There is only 1 eye guard on the left side it is 1 1/4 long

huntergreg · « **Reply #9 on:** January 17, 2010, 02:13:39 PM »

Quote from: boneaddict on January 17, 2010, 02:01:59 PM

I'd still say 140. Eyeguards don't look big enough to count, and the backs don't look nearly 20+. Sure you measured the same deer.

If you measure from the burs to the tip following the back side all the way to the tip is 21 1/8 in on the right and 20 1/8 on the left.

Crowns · « **Reply #10 on:** January 17, 2010, 02:15:44 PM »

You dont measure the 2's from the bur. You measure from the beam.

huntergreg · « **Reply #11 on:** January 17, 2010, 02:18:34 PM »

Quote from: Crowns on January 17, 2010, 02:15:44 PM

You dont measure the 2's from the bur. You measure from the beam.

I think I measured them from the bur to the tip

boneaddict · « **Reply #12 on:** January 17, 2010, 02:22:39 PM »

Take a ruler, and find the natural line of the beam that each point comes out of. Use a pencil and lightly mark it. This will make it easier to decide where to measure too. Always side with being conservative. When measureing mass, remember its the smallest point or smallest mass for that given measurement. I am guessing the eyeguard isn't quite long enough to count.

huntergreg · « **Reply #13 on:** January 17, 2010, 02:23:33 PM »

This is the first deer i have ever tried to measure dont know to much about it.

boneaddict · « **Reply #14 on:** January 17, 2010, 02:34:28 PM »

No problem, thats why we are here. Its how you get to know. Measure measure measure. Let me know if you have any other questions.

P.S. Thats why I say 140....not as an insult, just thats about what it looks like, so please don't take it personally.

Kowsrule30 · « **Reply #15 on:** January 17, 2010, 03:06:48 PM »

I was gonna say 130 and I'm not so good at judging/estimating.... Let alone measuring....

bonkellekter · « **Reply #16 on:** January 17, 2010, 03:19:50 PM »

It looks to be a little bigger than this buck that officially scored 143 and change. so I'd say he is closer to 150

huntergreg · « **Reply #17 on:** January 17, 2010, 04:10:18 PM »

Quote from: boneaddict on January 17, 2010, 02:34:28 PM

No problem, thats why we are here. Its how you get to know. Measure measure measure. Let me know if you have any other questions.

P.S. Thats why I say 140....not as an insult, just thats about what it looks like, so please don't take it personally.

Not taking it personal. I would love to learn how to do it right!!

huntnphool · « **Reply #18 on:** January 17, 2010, 07:23:45 PM »

Measure here across the back.

huntergreg · « **Reply #19 on:** January 17, 2010, 07:41:32 PM »

I was measuring from the bur to the tip. I will try to redo it and see what the score is.

huntnphool · « **Reply #20 on:** January 17, 2010, 07:46:13 PM »

and your next ones, again on the backside.

huntergreg · « **Reply #21 on:** January 17, 2010, 07:51:33 PM »

I redid it and came up with 148 2/8.

haugenna · « **Reply #22 on:** January 18, 2010, 10:43:58 PM »

Hmmm I still think you are a little high. Somebody have the boone and crockett form?

Did you measure the beam length and the "G5's" ,last point or bottom of the fronts, twice ??

carpsniperg2 · « **Reply #23 on:** January 18, 2010, 10:56:38 PM »

yeah that does seem a bit high i would say 135-140max my dad killed a buck about 4-5 years ago almost twin to that one maybe his had a little better forks and it was 135

huntandjeep · « **Reply #24 on:** January 19, 2010, 03:53:17 PM »

im thinking low 140

boneaddict · « **Reply #25 on:** January 19, 2010, 04:15:28 PM »

You are getting closer.

Fun practice isn't it.

alanger · « **Reply #26 on:** January 19, 2010, 04:21:10 PM »

however you score it, it still looks like a dandy buck.

huntergreg · « **Reply #27 on:** January 19, 2010, 05:18:46 PM »

thanks for all the info on trying to figure this scoring thing out. Im going to try and find someone who I can take it to and have them show me the right way to measure.

wastickslinger · « **Reply #28 on:** January 19, 2010, 05:41:56 PM »

I would have said mid 140's gross

boneaddict · « **Reply #29 on:** January 19, 2010, 05:46:53 PM »

Sportsman show is coming up in Yakima.

MtnMuley · « **Reply #30 on:** January 20, 2010, 08:04:51 AM »

Looks like it could be a potential 148"er to me. In my opinion the medium sized bucks look bigger in pics, and the bigger bucks look smaller in pics. Very hard to score a deer by a pic..........you can get an idea though.

Buckwheat · « **Reply #31 on:** January 23, 2010, 09:37:41 PM »

that probably wouldnt score in the 140s

News:

Advertisement

Author Topic: What does this set of anlers score? Mule deer (Read 6218 times)

Advertisement

Quick Links

Recent Topics