My buddies 200" buck

[jstamp]

RIGHT                           
MAIN BEAM 19 7/8               
G1 1 2/8
G2 24 2/8
G3 11 2/8
G4 11 2/8
H1 5
H2 4 5/8
H3 3 7/8
H4 4

TOTAL 85 3/8
LENGTH OF ABNORMAL POINTS 9 3/8

LEFT
MAIN BEAM 21 2/8
G1 1 6/8
G2 24 1/8
G3 11 1/8
G4 11
H1 5 5/8
H2 4 6/8
H3 4
H4 4 2/8
TOTAL 87 2/8

INSIDE SPREAD CREDIT 18 1/8
OUTSIDE SPREAD 29 1/8

GROSS 200 1/8
FRAME 190 6/8
NET 178 4/8

[Samish]

Great buck. A shooter for sure. I have a real hard time seeing 24" on the G2s. If the g3s are 11, the g2s look more like 16". very nice buck though

[wastickslinger]

awesome buck!!!

My guess is that they made a common mistake and measured the G2 from the burr rather than from main beam, that would make sense at 24". With G3's at 11" the G2's cant be more than 17-18".

Who cares, I would whack him in a heart beat with any tag!!!!!

[Bigshooter]

awesome buck!!!

My guess is that they made a common mistake and measured the G2 from the burr rather than from main beam, that would make sense at 24". With G3's at 11" the G2's cant be more than 17-18".

Who cares, I would whack him in a heart beat with any tag!!!!!

That is a common mistake.  But this buck was scored by an official scorer.  Atleast that is what I have been told.

[jjhunter]

At first glance, you notice the extremely short MB's and tight inside spread.  This absolutely kills a buck on score.   I see this a lot in MT, where I am assuming this buck was killed?   Passed a lot of big framed deer in that state because of this.   In reality, he has about 36" of mass and 16-17 G-2's - A mid 180's gross kind of buck.

A GREAT buck and one to be proud of for sure!

[Romulus]

fantastic buck thanks for posting. Was not trying to be critical just did not see 46 inches of mass. Like others have posted the G-2 measurement is not correct so the buck will be around 13-16 inches smaller gross score than shows on the score sheet. 24 inch G-2s stand out like 46 inches of mass. Either is almost unheard of. Still a great trophy buck and one to be proud of!

[jstamp]

i just copied the score sheet. since i haven't seen the horns yet, and it was scored by an official B&C scorer, I wasn't gonna question it too much. I did tell my buddy that 24" G2's are giant, and he told me that they are big, but this is only the 2nd mule deer he's ever killed on his 2nd mule deer hunt. i will get a chance to put my hands on it in about 3 weeks, and will take more pics and let everyone know how i scored it. just so we're all on the same page here, i don't see 24 inches on the 2's either.

[rosscrazyelk]

Did I miss what weapon it was with?

[robb92]

Nice buck for sure regardless of what he scores!

[rosscrazyelk]

WHAT KIND OF WEAPON?

[jjhunter]

WHAT KIND OF WEAPON?

Ross,

Just an educated guess, but I am pretty sure I head about that buck from a member back in November.   If I recall, it was a MT buck, killed with a rifle in early NOV?

[jstamp]

I was finally able to see the horns and put a quick tape on the g2's. they were measured wrong. the right g2 is around 17 and left is around 16. still a dandy buck, but i would be a little pissed about the guy who scored it being off that far. I didn't tape the whole buck out (didn't have time) so i don't know if any other measurements are off, but everything else looked right. my best guess is, without taping the whole thing out is mid 180's gross. just thought everyone on here would like to know 

[huntnphool]

  Still one hell of a nice buck jstamp, thanks for the update.

[Pathfinder101]

Yeah, I'd only sell my sister for a 180" buck...

[boneaddict]

Nice 180 buck.  Still a good one.   Measurers make mistakes too.   I had one measure an antler for me and he marked down like 8 inches for an eyeguard.  I was dude, are you kidding me.   I had to have it remeasured and lost 3 inches off the score.  No way was I going to send it in with 8 inches for an eyeguard. 

Nice trophy for him.  Hopefully he didn't tell to many people he shot a 200 inch buck.  Thats alot of humble pie.