This thread has been a delight, in that it has featured tasteful, even-keeled debate. My hat is off to those who have participated.
Lowedog (I believe it was) asked something like, "Why aren't there modern guys who complain about technology taking time in the field away from them." There are! They are out there asking, "How did it ever get so out of hand?" Among them are former WDFW commissioners Kelly from Kettle Falls and Jerry from Wenatchee who have been (and I hope will continue to be) vocal about the impact that 1000 yard shot capabilities has had on rifle hunting.
Another post (I forget who made it; that is not important) said that they rub shoulders with lots of traditionalists and has not heard them espousing ideas of needing to curtail technology. I suggest that many feel that the "cat is already out of the bag" and nothing can be done to "get the train back on the track". But with each and every nip here and cut there in our seasons I think we'll hear more and more people say, "Now just a darned minute! Don't lump me in with them. I'm not killing so danged many animals that you need to keep me from taking my walk in the woods."
Ribka & Boneaddict. You guys made some fines posts that give a glimpse of what makes you tick and why you choose a stick. I hope many, many people will ponder your words. And of those, that a few will spark with a connection.
Ray, keep up the good work. I must mention that a stringent requirement that wood be part of the working limb of a bow would have cost the Khans many a battle won with the power of horn bows. Aside from that I could not agree with your points in this thread more.