Free: Contests & Raffles.
While symbolic, here is a little test for you. Go to the WDFW main page and then hit refresh 20 times. How many of the banner pictures at the top of the screen are of game animals? I went 0 for 20, I clicked 24 times before I got a game animal (If you want to count a merganzer).I will probably send letters in support of the WDFW for 2 reasons. #1 I want them to go back to there roots and start mananaging for abundance of GAME species both wild game and fish. A super agency will be harder to change than an individual agency.#2 The grass is not always greener (or in this case it may become greener as in econuts) on the other side. I don't know but the unkown is not always better than the known.Shootmoore
Quote from: Shootmoore on February 14, 2010, 10:15:46 AMWhile symbolic, here is a little test for you. Go to the WDFW main page and then hit refresh 20 times. How many of the banner pictures at the top of the screen are of game animals? I went 0 for 20, I clicked 24 times before I got a game animal (If you want to count a merganzer).I will probably send letters in support of the WDFW for 2 reasons. #1 I want them to go back to there roots and start mananaging for abundance of GAME species both wild game and fish. A super agency will be harder to change than an individual agency.#2 The grass is not always greener (or in this case it may become greener as in econuts) on the other side. I don't know but the unkown is not always better than the known.Shootmoore I agree, shootmore. As an employee of the government, it is terribly difficult to make any changes... let alone positive ones. The smaller the agency, the better chance for change. Here's hoping this is a wake-up call for the WDFW, and remind them who ends up keeping them on the payroll: the sportsmen.
WDFW-SUXyour out of control